Demographics details for Big bear lake, CA vs Dighton, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Big bear lake, CA vs Dighton, MA.

Data Big bear lake Dighton
Population 5,031 7,891
Median Age 47.5 years 42.0 years
Median Income $70,020 $77,750
Married Families 42.0% 64.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Big bear lake vs Dighton

  • The population in Dighton is higher at 7,891, compared to 5,031 in Big bear lake.
  • Residents in Big bear lake have a higher median age of 47.5 years compared to 42.0 years in Dighton.
  • Dighton has a higher median income of $77,750, compared to $70,020 in Big bear lake.
  • In Dighton, the percentage of married families is higher at 64.0%, compared to 42.0% in Big bear lake.
  • Big bear lake has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Dighton.
  • The unemployment rate in Big bear lake is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Dighton.

Demographics

Demographics Big bear lake vs Dighton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Big bear lake Dighton
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 50 96
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 30 2
Two or More Races 16 1
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Big bear lake vs Dighton

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Big bear lake and Dighton at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Dighton at 96% compared to 50% in Big bear lake.
  • The Asian population is larger in Big bear lake at 3% compared to 1% in Dighton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Big bear lake at 30% compared to 2% in Dighton.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Big bear lake at 16% compared to 1% in Dighton.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Big bear lake at 1% compared to 0% in Dighton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Big bear lake Dighton
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% Data is updating%
Depression 20.5% Data is updating%
Smoking 14.1% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 17.0% Data is updating%
Obesity 37.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 9.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Big bear lake vs Dighton

  • More residents in Big bear lake report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Dighton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Big bear lake at 20.5% compared to 0.0% in Dighton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Big bear lake at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Dighton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Big bear lake at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Dighton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Big bear lake at 37.0% compared to 0.0% in Dighton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Big bear lake at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Dighton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Big bear lake Dighton
No Schooling 0.7% (37) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.4% (825) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 12.6% (634) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.7% (1,294) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Big bear lake vs Dighton

  • A higher percentage of residents in Big bear lake have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Dighton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Big bear lake hold a high school diploma at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Dighton.
  • More residents in Big bear lake have less than a high school education at 12.6% compared to 0.0% in Dighton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Big bear lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.7% compared to 0.0% in Dighton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.