Demographics details for Big bear lake, CA vs Conroe, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Big bear lake, CA vs Conroe, TX.
| Data | Big bear lake | Conroe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,031 | 101,405 |
| Median Age | 47.5 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $70,020 | $71,630 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Big bear lake vs Conroe
- The population in Conroe is higher at 101,405, compared to 5,031 in Big bear lake.
- Residents in Big bear lake have a higher median age of 47.5 years compared to 33.5 years in Conroe.
- Conroe has a higher median income of $71,630, compared to $70,020 in Big bear lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Big bear lake at 42.0% compared to 37.0% in Conroe.
- The poverty level is higher in Conroe at 11%, compared to 10% in Big bear lake.
- The unemployment rate in Big bear lake is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Conroe.
Demographics
Demographics Big bear lake vs Conroe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Big bear lake | Conroe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 10 |
| White | 50 | 50 |
| Asian | 3 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Big bear lake vs Conroe
- In Conroe, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Big bear lake.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Big bear lake and Conroe at 50%.
- Both Big bear lake and Conroe have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Big bear lake at 30% compared to 26% in Conroe.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Big bear lake at 16% compared to 10% in Conroe.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Big bear lake and Conroe at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Big bear lake | Conroe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 37.0% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Big bear lake vs Conroe
- More residents in Big bear lake report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 17.2% in Conroe.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Conroe at 22.5% versus 20.5% in Big bear lake.
- Conroe has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 14.1% in Big bear lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Conroe at 17.4% compared to 17.0% in Big bear lake.
- Conroe has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 37.0% in Big bear lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Big bear lake at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Conroe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Big bear lake | Conroe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (37) | 1.0% (1,025) |
| High School Diploma | 16.4% (825) | 11.8% (11,921) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (634) | 15.0% (15,214) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.7% (1,294) | 18.9% (19,161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Big bear lake vs Conroe
- In Conroe, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Big bear lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Big bear lake hold a high school diploma at 16.4% compared to 11.8% in Conroe.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Conroe at 15.0%, compared to 12.6% in Big bear lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Big bear lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.7% compared to 18.9% in Conroe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.