Demographics details for Big bear lake, CA vs Attica, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Big bear lake, CA vs Attica, OH.
Data | Big bear lake | Attica |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,031 | 871 |
Median Age | 47.5 years | 50.6 years |
Median Income | $70,020 | $71,563 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Big bear lake vs Attica
- In Big bear lake, the population is higher at 5,031, compared to 871 in Attica.
- The median age in Attica is higher at 50.6 years, compared to 47.5 years in Big bear lake.
- Attica has a higher median income of $71,563, compared to $70,020 in Big bear lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Big bear lake at 42.0% compared to 36.0% in Attica.
- The poverty level is identical in both Big bear lake and Attica at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Big bear lake is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Attica.
Demographics
Demographics Big bear lake vs Attica provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Big bear lake | Attica |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 50 | 97 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 30 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 16 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Big bear lake vs Attica
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Big bear lake and Attica at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Attica at 97% compared to 50% in Big bear lake.
- The Asian population is larger in Big bear lake at 3% compared to 0% in Attica.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Big bear lake at 30% compared to 0% in Attica.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Big bear lake at 16% compared to 3% in Attica.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Big bear lake at 1% compared to 0% in Attica.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Big bear lake | Attica |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 12.1% |
Depression | 20.5% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 14.1% | 22.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 37.0% | 41.4% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Big bear lake vs Attica
- In Attica, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.4% in Big bear lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Attica at 24.3% versus 20.5% in Big bear lake.
- Attica has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 14.1% in Big bear lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Attica at 18.4% compared to 17.0% in Big bear lake.
- Attica has higher obesity rates at 41.4% compared to 37.0% in Big bear lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Attica at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Big bear lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Big bear lake | Attica |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (37) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.4% (825) | 30.1% (262) |
Less than High School | 12.6% (634) | 7.6% (66) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.7% (1,294) | 7.0% (61) |
Education Levels Comparison: Big bear lake vs Attica
- A higher percentage of residents in Big bear lake have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Attica.
- In Attica, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.1% compared to 16.4% in Big bear lake.
- More residents in Big bear lake have less than a high school education at 12.6% compared to 7.6% in Attica.
- A higher percentage of residents in Big bear lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.7% compared to 7.0% in Attica.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.