Demographics details for Bieber, CA vs Cedar lake, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bieber, CA vs Cedar lake, IN.
| Data | Bieber | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 151 | 15,592 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $46,667 | $84,444 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bieber vs Cedar lake
- The population in Cedar lake is higher at 15,592, compared to 151 in Bieber.
- The median age in Cedar lake is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 33.6 years in Bieber.
- Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444, compared to $46,667 in Bieber.
- In Cedar lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 34.0% in Bieber.
- The poverty level is higher in Cedar lake at 5%, compared to 0% in Bieber.
- The unemployment rate in Bieber is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.
Demographics
Demographics Bieber vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bieber | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 94 | 94 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bieber vs Cedar lake
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Bieber and Cedar lake at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Bieber and Cedar lake at 94%.
- Both Bieber and Cedar lake have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Bieber and Cedar lake at 3%.
- Both Bieber and Cedar lake have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bieber and Cedar lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bieber | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 30.8% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bieber vs Cedar lake
- More residents in Bieber report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.6% in Cedar lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar lake at 25.4% versus 21.1% in Bieber.
- Cedar lake has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 14.9% in Bieber.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 18.1% in Bieber.
- Cedar lake has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 30.8% in Bieber.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bieber at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bieber | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (67) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (20) | 21.1% (3,292) |
| Less than High School | 5.3% (8) | 7.1% (1,102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.0% (9) | 14.1% (2,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bieber vs Cedar lake
- In Cedar lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Bieber.
- In Cedar lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 13.2% in Bieber.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar lake at 7.1%, compared to 5.3% in Bieber.
- In Cedar lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 6.0% in Bieber.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.