Demographics details for Bieber, CA vs Cedar grove, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bieber, CA vs Cedar grove, WV.

Data Bieber Cedar grove
Population 151 693
Median Age 33.6 years 44.3 years
Median Income $46,667 $55,600
Married Families 34.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.5

Population Comparison: Bieber vs Cedar grove

  • The population in Cedar grove is higher at 693, compared to 151 in Bieber.
  • The median age in Cedar grove is higher at 44.3 years, compared to 33.6 years in Bieber.
  • Cedar grove has a higher median income of $55,600, compared to $46,667 in Bieber.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Bieber at 34.0% compared to 31.0% in Cedar grove.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cedar grove at 12%, compared to 0% in Bieber.
  • The unemployment rate in Bieber is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Cedar grove.

Demographics

Demographics Bieber vs Cedar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bieber Cedar grove
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 94 98
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 Data is updating
Two or More Races 3 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bieber vs Cedar grove

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Bieber and Cedar grove at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar grove at 98% compared to 94% in Bieber.
  • Both Bieber and Cedar grove have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Bieber at 3% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Bieber at 3% compared to 2% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bieber and Cedar grove at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bieber Cedar grove
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 22.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 15.7%
Depression 21.1% 30.1%
Smoking 14.9% 24.6%
Binge Drinking 18.1% 13.9%
Obesity 30.8% 40.4%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bieber vs Cedar grove

  • In Cedar grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 17.6% in Bieber.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar grove at 30.1% versus 21.1% in Bieber.
  • Cedar grove has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 14.9% in Bieber.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Bieber at 18.1% compared to 13.9% in Cedar grove.
  • Cedar grove has higher obesity rates at 40.4% compared to 30.8% in Bieber.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar grove at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Bieber.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bieber Cedar grove
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.6% (4)
High School Diploma 13.2% (20) 21.2% (147)
Less than High School 5.3% (8) 18.5% (128)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.0% (9) 2.3% (16)

Education Levels Comparison: Bieber vs Cedar grove

  • In Cedar grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Bieber.
  • In Cedar grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 13.2% in Bieber.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar grove at 18.5%, compared to 5.3% in Bieber.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bieber hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.0% compared to 2.3% in Cedar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.