Demographics details for Bethlehem, PA vs Rancho cucamonga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bethlehem, PA vs Rancho cucamonga, CA.
| Data | Bethlehem | Rancho cucamonga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,617 | 176,336 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $62,072 | $105,534 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Bethlehem vs Rancho cucamonga
- The population in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 176,336, compared to 77,617 in Bethlehem.
- The median age in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 35.9 years in Bethlehem.
- Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534, compared to $62,072 in Bethlehem.
- In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 29.0% in Bethlehem.
- Bethlehem has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Rancho cucamonga has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.5% in Bethlehem.
Demographics
Demographics Bethlehem vs Rancho cucamonga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bethlehem | Rancho cucamonga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 9 |
| White | 47 | 22 |
| Asian | 3 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 39 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bethlehem vs Rancho cucamonga
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Bethlehem and Rancho cucamonga at 9%.
- Bethlehem has a higher percentage of White residents at 47% compared to 22% in Rancho cucamonga.
- In Rancho cucamonga, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 3% in Bethlehem.
- Rancho cucamonga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 30% in Bethlehem.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rancho cucamonga at 15%, compared to 11% in Bethlehem.
- In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bethlehem.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bethlehem | Rancho cucamonga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 18.4% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 33.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bethlehem vs Rancho cucamonga
- More residents in Bethlehem report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.8% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bethlehem at 21.8% compared to 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bethlehem at 18.4% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bethlehem at 17.6% compared to 16.6% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bethlehem at 34.7% compared to 33.9% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bethlehem at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bethlehem | Rancho cucamonga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (452) | 1.2% (2,052) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (13,125) | 11.7% (20,590) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (10,045) | 10.0% (17,566) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.0% (17,044) | 25.3% (44,534) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bethlehem vs Rancho cucamonga
- In Rancho cucamonga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Bethlehem.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bethlehem hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 11.7% in Rancho cucamonga.
- More residents in Bethlehem have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
- In Rancho cucamonga, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 22.0% in Bethlehem.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.