Demographics details for Bethlehem, PA vs Manassas park, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bethlehem, PA vs Manassas park, VA.

Data Bethlehem Manassas park
Population 77,617 16,703
Median Age 35.9 years 35.8 years
Median Income $62,072 $91,673
Married Families 29.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 13% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 2.7

Population Comparison: Bethlehem vs Manassas park

  • In Bethlehem, the population is higher at 77,617, compared to 16,703 in Manassas park.
  • Residents in Bethlehem have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 35.8 years in Manassas park.
  • Manassas park has a higher median income of $91,673, compared to $62,072 in Bethlehem.
  • In Manassas park, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 29.0% in Bethlehem.
  • Bethlehem has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Manassas park.
  • The unemployment rate in Bethlehem is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.7% in Manassas park.

Demographics

Demographics Bethlehem vs Manassas park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bethlehem Manassas park
Black 9 15
White 47 16
Asian 3 11
Hispanic 30 43
Two or More Races 11 12
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Bethlehem vs Manassas park

  • In Manassas park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 9% in Bethlehem.
  • Bethlehem has a higher percentage of White residents at 47% compared to 16% in Manassas park.
  • In Manassas park, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 3% in Bethlehem.
  • Manassas park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 30% in Bethlehem.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Manassas park at 12%, compared to 11% in Bethlehem.
  • In Manassas park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Bethlehem.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bethlehem Manassas park
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 10.7%
Depression 21.8% 20.0%
Smoking 18.4% 14.6%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 16.7%
Obesity 34.7% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bethlehem vs Manassas park

  • More residents in Bethlehem report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.4% in Manassas park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Bethlehem at 21.8% compared to 20.0% in Manassas park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bethlehem at 18.4% compared to 14.6% in Manassas park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Bethlehem at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in Manassas park.
  • Manassas park has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 34.7% in Bethlehem.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Bethlehem at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Manassas park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bethlehem Manassas park
No Schooling 0.6% (452) 6.2% (1,032)
High School Diploma 16.9% (13,125) 18.3% (3,054)
Less than High School 12.9% (10,045) 25.9% (4,321)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.0% (17,044) 17.0% (2,847)

Education Levels Comparison: Bethlehem vs Manassas park

  • In Manassas park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.6% in Bethlehem.
  • In Manassas park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 16.9% in Bethlehem.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manassas park at 25.9%, compared to 12.9% in Bethlehem.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bethlehem hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 17.0% in Manassas park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.