Demographics details for Bethany, OK vs Sugar land, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bethany, OK vs Sugar land, TX.
| Data | Bethany | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,447 | 109,414 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 42.5 years |
| Median Income | $54,606 | $132,247 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Bethany vs Sugar land
- The population in Sugar land is higher at 109,414, compared to 20,447 in Bethany.
- The median age in Sugar land is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 32.7 years in Bethany.
- Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247, compared to $54,606 in Bethany.
- In Sugar land, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 34.0% in Bethany.
- Bethany has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 6% in Sugar land.
- Sugar land has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Bethany.
Demographics
Demographics Bethany vs Sugar land provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bethany | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 7 |
| White | 56 | 33 |
| Asian | 1 | 39 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 8 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bethany vs Sugar land
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bethany at 8% compared to 7% in Sugar land.
- Bethany has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
- In Sugar land, the Asian population stands at 39%, greater than 1% in Bethany.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bethany at 20% compared to 13% in Sugar land.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bethany at 12% compared to 8% in Sugar land.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bethany at 3% compared to 0% in Sugar land.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bethany | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 16.9% |
| Smoking | 18.1% | 9.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 25.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bethany vs Sugar land
- More residents in Bethany report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bethany at 26.6% compared to 16.9% in Sugar land.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bethany at 18.1% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sugar land at 16.0% compared to 13.5% in Bethany.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bethany at 37.6% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bethany at 17.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bethany | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (246) | 1.2% (1,314) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (3,220) | 7.3% (7,972) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (2,736) | 4.3% (4,753) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.7% (3,014) | 42.8% (46,851) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bethany vs Sugar land
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Bethany and Sugar land at 1.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bethany hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 7.3% in Sugar land.
- More residents in Bethany have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 4.3% in Sugar land.
- In Sugar land, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 14.7% in Bethany.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.