Demographics details for Bessemer, AL vs Mount union, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bessemer, AL vs Mount union, PA.
| Data | Bessemer | Mount union |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,264 | 2,267 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $34,953 | $38,382 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 26% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Bessemer vs Mount union
- In Bessemer, the population is higher at 25,264, compared to 2,267 in Mount union.
- Residents in Bessemer have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 34.8 years in Mount union.
- Mount union has a higher median income of $38,382, compared to $34,953 in Bessemer.
- In Mount union, the percentage of married families is higher at 25.0%, compared to 22.0% in Bessemer.
- Bessemer has a higher poverty level at 26% compared to 12% in Mount union.
- Mount union has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Bessemer.
Demographics
Demographics Bessemer vs Mount union provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bessemer | Mount union |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 74 | 8 |
| White | 15 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bessemer vs Mount union
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bessemer at 74% compared to 8% in Mount union.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount union at 87% compared to 15% in Bessemer.
- Both Bessemer and Mount union have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bessemer at 7% compared to 1% in Mount union.
- Both Bessemer and Mount union have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bessemer and Mount union at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bessemer | Mount union |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 20.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 26.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 45.9% | 43.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bessemer vs Mount union
- In Mount union, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 20.4% in Bessemer.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mount union at 25.6% versus 21.7% in Bessemer.
- Mount union has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 22.6% in Bessemer.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mount union at 16.4% compared to 12.7% in Bessemer.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bessemer at 45.9% compared to 43.0% in Mount union.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bessemer at 27.0% compared to 20.0% in Mount union.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bessemer | Mount union |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (363) | 1.9% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (6,303) | 28.5% (646) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (3,370) | 16.3% (370) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (2,453) | 6.3% (142) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bessemer vs Mount union
- In Mount union, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.4% in Bessemer.
- In Mount union, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.5% compared to 24.9% in Bessemer.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mount union at 16.3%, compared to 13.3% in Bessemer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bessemer hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.7% compared to 6.3% in Mount union.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.