Demographics details for Bessemer, AL vs Markleeville, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bessemer, AL vs Markleeville, CA.

Data Bessemer Markleeville
Population 25,264 163
Median Age 41.8 years 64.6 years
Median Income $34,953 $93,333
Married Families 22.0% 63.0%
Poverty Level 26% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.2

Population Comparison: Bessemer vs Markleeville

  • In Bessemer, the population is higher at 25,264, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
  • The median age in Markleeville is higher at 64.6 years, compared to 41.8 years in Bessemer.
  • Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333, compared to $34,953 in Bessemer.
  • In Markleeville, the percentage of married families is higher at 63.0%, compared to 22.0% in Bessemer.
  • Bessemer has a higher poverty level at 26% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • Markleeville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Bessemer.

Demographics

Demographics Bessemer vs Markleeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bessemer Markleeville
Black 74 Data is updating
White 15 77
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 7 23
Two or More Races 4 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bessemer vs Markleeville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bessemer at 74% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Markleeville at 77% compared to 15% in Bessemer.
  • Both Bessemer and Markleeville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Markleeville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 7% in Bessemer.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Bessemer at 4% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bessemer and Markleeville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bessemer Markleeville
Mental Health Not Good 20.4% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 15.1% 12.0%
Depression 21.7% 23.0%
Smoking 22.6% 15.4%
Binge Drinking 12.7% 17.1%
Obesity 45.9% 30.0%
Disability Percentage 27.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bessemer vs Markleeville

  • More residents in Bessemer report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 18.3% in Markleeville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Markleeville at 23.0% versus 21.7% in Bessemer.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bessemer at 22.6% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Markleeville at 17.1% compared to 12.7% in Bessemer.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bessemer at 45.9% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Bessemer at 27.0% compared to 17.0% in Markleeville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bessemer Markleeville
No Schooling 1.4% (363) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 24.9% (6,303) 19.6% (32)
Less than High School 13.3% (3,370) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.7% (2,453) 35.6% (58)

Education Levels Comparison: Bessemer vs Markleeville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Bessemer have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bessemer hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 19.6% in Markleeville.
  • More residents in Bessemer have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • In Markleeville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 9.7% in Bessemer.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.