Demographics details for Bessemer, AL vs Markleeville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bessemer, AL vs Markleeville, CA.
Data | Bessemer | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,264 | 163 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 64.6 years |
Median Income | $34,953 | $93,333 |
Married Families | 22.0% | 63.0% |
Poverty Level | 26% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Bessemer vs Markleeville
- In Bessemer, the population is higher at 25,264, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
- The median age in Markleeville is higher at 64.6 years, compared to 41.8 years in Bessemer.
- Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333, compared to $34,953 in Bessemer.
- In Markleeville, the percentage of married families is higher at 63.0%, compared to 22.0% in Bessemer.
- Bessemer has a higher poverty level at 26% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- Markleeville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Bessemer.
Demographics
Demographics Bessemer vs Markleeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bessemer | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Black | 74 | Data is updating |
White | 15 | 77 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bessemer vs Markleeville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bessemer at 74% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Markleeville at 77% compared to 15% in Bessemer.
- Both Bessemer and Markleeville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Markleeville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 7% in Bessemer.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bessemer at 4% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bessemer and Markleeville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bessemer | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 12.0% |
Depression | 21.7% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 22.6% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 45.9% | 30.0% |
Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bessemer vs Markleeville
- More residents in Bessemer report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 18.3% in Markleeville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Markleeville at 23.0% versus 21.7% in Bessemer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bessemer at 22.6% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Markleeville at 17.1% compared to 12.7% in Bessemer.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bessemer at 45.9% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bessemer at 27.0% compared to 17.0% in Markleeville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bessemer | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (363) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 24.9% (6,303) | 19.6% (32) |
Less than High School | 13.3% (3,370) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (2,453) | 35.6% (58) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bessemer vs Markleeville
- A higher percentage of residents in Bessemer have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bessemer hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 19.6% in Markleeville.
- More residents in Bessemer have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
- In Markleeville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 9.7% in Bessemer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.