Demographics details for Bessemer, AL vs Grand junction, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bessemer, AL vs Grand junction, CO.
Data | Bessemer | Grand junction |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,264 | 68,034 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 39.9 years |
Median Income | $34,953 | $62,993 |
Married Families | 22.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 26% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Bessemer vs Grand junction
- The population in Grand junction is higher at 68,034, compared to 25,264 in Bessemer.
- Residents in Bessemer have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 39.9 years in Grand junction.
- Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993, compared to $34,953 in Bessemer.
- In Grand junction, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 22.0% in Bessemer.
- Bessemer has a higher poverty level at 26% compared to 10% in Grand junction.
- Grand junction has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.0% in Bessemer.
Demographics
Demographics Bessemer vs Grand junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bessemer | Grand junction |
---|---|---|
Black | 74 | 1 |
White | 15 | 73 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 7 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bessemer vs Grand junction
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bessemer at 74% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand junction at 73% compared to 15% in Bessemer.
- In Grand junction, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Bessemer.
- Grand junction has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 7% in Bessemer.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand junction at 8%, compared to 4% in Bessemer.
- In Grand junction, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bessemer.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bessemer | Grand junction |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 17.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 11.8% |
Depression | 21.7% | 24.5% |
Smoking | 22.6% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 19.2% |
Obesity | 45.9% | 29.2% |
Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bessemer vs Grand junction
- More residents in Bessemer report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 17.8% in Grand junction.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grand junction at 24.5% versus 21.7% in Bessemer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bessemer at 22.6% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 12.7% in Bessemer.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bessemer at 45.9% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bessemer at 27.0% compared to 15.0% in Grand junction.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bessemer | Grand junction |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (363) | 0.4% (245) |
High School Diploma | 24.9% (6,303) | 13.9% (9,476) |
Less than High School | 13.3% (3,370) | 9.7% (6,605) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (2,453) | 23.8% (16,201) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bessemer vs Grand junction
- A higher percentage of residents in Bessemer have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.4% in Grand junction.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bessemer hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
- More residents in Bessemer have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 9.7% in Grand junction.
- In Grand junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 9.7% in Bessemer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.