Demographics details for Berkeley, CA vs Macclenny, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Berkeley, CA vs Macclenny, FL.
| Data | Berkeley | Macclenny |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 118,950 | 7,670 |
| Median Age | 32.5 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $104,716 | $62,134 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Berkeley vs Macclenny
- In Berkeley, the population is higher at 118,950, compared to 7,670 in Macclenny.
- The median age in Macclenny is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 32.5 years in Berkeley.
- Berkeley has a higher median income of $104,716 compared to $62,134 in Macclenny.
- In Macclenny, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 31.0% in Berkeley.
- Berkeley has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 11% in Macclenny.
- The unemployment rate in Berkeley is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Macclenny.
Demographics
Demographics Berkeley vs Macclenny provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Berkeley | Macclenny |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 19 |
| White | 48 | 66 |
| Asian | 21 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Berkeley vs Macclenny
- In Macclenny, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 8% in Berkeley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Macclenny at 66% compared to 48% in Berkeley.
- The Asian population is larger in Berkeley at 21% compared to 1% in Macclenny.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Berkeley at 12% compared to 4% in Macclenny.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Berkeley at 10% compared to 9% in Macclenny.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Berkeley and Macclenny at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Berkeley | Macclenny |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 9.0% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 26.8% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Berkeley vs Macclenny
- In Macclenny, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.0% in Berkeley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Macclenny at 20.4% versus 18.8% in Berkeley.
- Macclenny has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 9.0% in Berkeley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Macclenny at 17.1% compared to 16.1% in Berkeley.
- Macclenny has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 26.8% in Berkeley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Macclenny at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Berkeley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Berkeley | Macclenny |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (780) | 0.1% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 3.9% (4,580) | 17.8% (1,365) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (4,800) | 13.5% (1,033) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 47.8% (56,907) | 10.4% (799) |
Education Levels Comparison: Berkeley vs Macclenny
- A higher percentage of residents in Berkeley have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Macclenny.
- In Macclenny, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 3.9% in Berkeley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Macclenny at 13.5%, compared to 4.0% in Berkeley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Berkeley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.8% compared to 10.4% in Macclenny.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.