Demographics details for Bennington, VT vs Clermont, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bennington, VT vs Clermont, FL.

Data Bennington Clermont
Population 15,764 46,506
Median Age 42.5 years 41.7 years
Median Income $55,000 $75,951
Married Families 53.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 13% 9%
Unemployment Rate 2.9 3.7

Population Comparison: Bennington vs Clermont

  • The population in Clermont is higher at 46,506, compared to 15,764 in Bennington.
  • Residents in Bennington have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 41.7 years in Clermont.
  • Clermont has a higher median income of $75,951, compared to $55,000 in Bennington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Bennington at 53.0% compared to 41.0% in Clermont.
  • Bennington has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Clermont.
  • Clermont has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 2.9% in Bennington.

Demographics

Demographics Bennington vs Clermont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bennington Clermont
Black 1 14
White 95 45
Asian 1 4
Hispanic 3 21
Two or More Races Data is updating 16
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bennington vs Clermont

  • In Clermont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 1% in Bennington.
  • Bennington has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 45% in Clermont.
  • In Clermont, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Bennington.
  • Clermont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 3% in Bennington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clermont at 16%, compared to 0% in Bennington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bennington and Clermont at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bennington Clermont
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.1%
Depression Data is updating% 19.5%
Smoking Data is updating% 17.2%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 15.5%
Obesity Data is updating% 34.9%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bennington vs Clermont

  • In Clermont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clermont at 19.5% versus 0.0% in Bennington.
  • Clermont has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Clermont at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
  • Clermont has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clermont at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bennington Clermont
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (195)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.5% (5,809)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 5.7% (2,631)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 21.9% (10,177)

Education Levels Comparison: Bennington vs Clermont

  • In Clermont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
  • In Clermont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clermont at 5.7%, compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
  • In Clermont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.