Demographics details for Bendena, KS vs Warren, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bendena, KS vs Warren, MI.
| Data | Bendena | Warren |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 131 | 137,107 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $85,962 | $61,633 |
| Married Families | 66.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | Data is updating | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Bendena vs Warren
- The population in Warren is higher at 137,107, compared to 131 in Bendena.
- The median age in Warren is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 31.7 years in Bendena.
- Bendena has a higher median income of $85,962 compared to $61,633 in Warren.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bendena at 66.0% compared to 35.0% in Warren.
- The poverty level is higher in Warren at 10%, compared to 0% in Bendena.
- Warren has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 0.0% in Bendena.
Demographics
Demographics Bendena vs Warren provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bendena | Warren |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 20 |
| White | 100 | 61 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 11 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bendena vs Warren
- In Warren, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 0% in Bendena.
- Bendena has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 61% in Warren.
- In Warren, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Bendena.
- Warren has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Bendena.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Warren at 5%, compared to 0% in Bendena.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bendena and Warren at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bendena | Warren |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 23.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bendena vs Warren
- In Warren, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.1% in Bendena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Warren at 26.2% versus 22.5% in Bendena.
- Warren has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 16.9% in Bendena.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bendena at 19.2% compared to 16.8% in Warren.
- Warren has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 37.1% in Bendena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Warren at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Bendena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bendena | Warren |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.2% (3,043) |
| High School Diploma | 32.8% (43) | 20.2% (27,646) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 16.6% (22,733) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.1% (29) | 14.3% (19,563) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bendena vs Warren
- In Warren, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Bendena.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bendena hold a high school diploma at 32.8% compared to 20.2% in Warren.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Warren at 16.6%, compared to 0.0% in Bendena.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bendena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 14.3% in Warren.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.