Demographics details for Bendena, KS vs Fort calhoun, NE

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bendena, KS vs Fort calhoun, NE.

Data Bendena Fort calhoun
Population 131 1,115
Median Age 31.7 years 44.1 years
Median Income $85,962 $75,900
Married Families 66.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 8%
Unemployment Rate Data is updating 2.5

Population Comparison: Bendena vs Fort calhoun

  • The population in Fort calhoun is higher at 1,115, compared to 131 in Bendena.
  • The median age in Fort calhoun is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 31.7 years in Bendena.
  • Bendena has a higher median income of $85,962 compared to $75,900 in Fort calhoun.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Bendena at 66.0% compared to 40.0% in Fort calhoun.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort calhoun at 8%, compared to 0% in Bendena.
  • Fort calhoun has a higher unemployment rate at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Bendena.

Demographics

Demographics Bendena vs Fort calhoun provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bendena Fort calhoun
Black Data is updating 1
White 100 85
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 6
Two or More Races Data is updating 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bendena vs Fort calhoun

  • In Fort calhoun, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Bendena.
  • Bendena has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 85% in Fort calhoun.
  • Both Bendena and Fort calhoun have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Fort calhoun has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Bendena.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort calhoun at 8%, compared to 0% in Bendena.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bendena and Fort calhoun at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bendena Fort calhoun
Mental Health Not Good 16.1% 12.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.5% 7.7%
Depression 22.5% 15.3%
Smoking 16.9% 14.0%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 22.1%
Obesity 37.1% 33.3%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bendena vs Fort calhoun

  • More residents in Bendena report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Bendena at 22.5% compared to 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bendena at 16.9% compared to 14.0% in Fort calhoun.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 19.2% in Bendena.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bendena at 37.1% compared to 33.3% in Fort calhoun.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort calhoun at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Bendena.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bendena Fort calhoun
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 32.8% (43) 33.7% (376)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 6.5% (72)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.1% (29) 14.4% (161)

Education Levels Comparison: Bendena vs Fort calhoun

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Bendena and Fort calhoun at 0.0%.
  • In Fort calhoun, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.7% compared to 32.8% in Bendena.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort calhoun at 6.5%, compared to 0.0% in Bendena.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bendena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 14.4% in Fort calhoun.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.