Demographics details for Belmont, CA vs Sikeston, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Belmont, CA vs Sikeston, MO.
| Data | Belmont | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,773 | 16,073 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $185,944 | $47,464 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 2% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Belmont vs Sikeston
- In Belmont, the population is higher at 26,773, compared to 16,073 in Sikeston.
- Residents in Belmont have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 37.3 years in Sikeston.
- Belmont has a higher median income of $185,944 compared to $47,464 in Sikeston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Belmont at 50.0% compared to 36.0% in Sikeston.
- The poverty level is higher in Sikeston at 16%, compared to 2% in Belmont.
- The unemployment rate in Belmont is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.4% in Sikeston.
Demographics
Demographics Belmont vs Sikeston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Belmont | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 25 |
| White | 45 | 65 |
| Asian | 30 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 14 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Belmont vs Sikeston
- In Sikeston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 2% in Belmont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sikeston at 65% compared to 45% in Belmont.
- The Asian population is larger in Belmont at 30% compared to 0% in Sikeston.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Belmont at 14% compared to 3% in Sikeston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Belmont at 9% compared to 7% in Sikeston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Belmont and Sikeston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Belmont | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.2% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 15.5% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 7.1% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 20.5% | 39.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Belmont vs Sikeston
- In Sikeston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 12.2% in Belmont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sikeston at 24.6% versus 15.5% in Belmont.
- Sikeston has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 7.1% in Belmont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Belmont at 17.0% compared to 15.8% in Sikeston.
- Sikeston has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 20.5% in Belmont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sikeston at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in Belmont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Belmont | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (234) | 0.5% (76) |
| High School Diploma | 6.0% (1,604) | 23.0% (3,696) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (1,394) | 13.3% (2,142) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 51.4% (13,763) | 16.3% (2,619) |
Education Levels Comparison: Belmont vs Sikeston
- A higher percentage of residents in Belmont have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Sikeston.
- In Sikeston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 6.0% in Belmont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sikeston at 13.3%, compared to 5.2% in Belmont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Belmont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 16.3% in Sikeston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.