Demographics details for Belmont, CA vs Lynn haven, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Belmont, CA vs Lynn haven, FL.
Data | Belmont | Lynn haven |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,773 | 20,044 |
Median Age | 40.9 years | 35.4 years |
Median Income | $185,944 | $81,378 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 2% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Belmont vs Lynn haven
- In Belmont, the population is higher at 26,773, compared to 20,044 in Lynn haven.
- Residents in Belmont have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 35.4 years in Lynn haven.
- Belmont has a higher median income of $185,944 compared to $81,378 in Lynn haven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Belmont at 50.0% compared to 43.0% in Lynn haven.
- The poverty level is higher in Lynn haven at 7%, compared to 2% in Belmont.
- Lynn haven has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.8% in Belmont.
Demographics
Demographics Belmont vs Lynn haven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Belmont | Lynn haven |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 8 |
White | 45 | 73 |
Asian | 30 | 3 |
Hispanic | 14 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Belmont vs Lynn haven
- In Lynn haven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 2% in Belmont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lynn haven at 73% compared to 45% in Belmont.
- The Asian population is larger in Belmont at 30% compared to 3% in Lynn haven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Belmont at 14% compared to 8% in Lynn haven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Belmont at 9% compared to 8% in Lynn haven.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Belmont and Lynn haven at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Belmont | Lynn haven |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.2% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 10.4% |
Depression | 15.5% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 7.1% | 18.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 20.5% | 28.9% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Belmont vs Lynn haven
- In Lynn haven, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 12.2% in Belmont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lynn haven at 21.3% versus 15.5% in Belmont.
- Lynn haven has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 7.1% in Belmont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Belmont at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in Lynn haven.
- Lynn haven has higher obesity rates at 28.9% compared to 20.5% in Belmont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lynn haven at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Belmont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Belmont | Lynn haven |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (234) | 1.1% (217) |
High School Diploma | 6.0% (1,604) | 11.8% (2,373) |
Less than High School | 5.2% (1,394) | 7.9% (1,576) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 51.4% (13,763) | 19.8% (3,974) |
Education Levels Comparison: Belmont vs Lynn haven
- In Lynn haven, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Belmont.
- In Lynn haven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.8% compared to 6.0% in Belmont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lynn haven at 7.9%, compared to 5.2% in Belmont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Belmont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 19.8% in Lynn haven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.