Demographics details for Belmont, CA vs Fond du lac, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Belmont, CA vs Fond du lac, WI.
Data | Belmont | Fond du lac |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,773 | 44,339 |
Median Age | 40.9 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $185,944 | $58,675 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 2% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Belmont vs Fond du lac
- The population in Fond du lac is higher at 44,339, compared to 26,773 in Belmont.
- Residents in Belmont have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 37.9 years in Fond du lac.
- Belmont has a higher median income of $185,944 compared to $58,675 in Fond du lac.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Belmont at 50.0% compared to 36.0% in Fond du lac.
- The poverty level is higher in Fond du lac at 8%, compared to 2% in Belmont.
- The unemployment rate in Belmont is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Fond du lac.
Demographics
Demographics Belmont vs Fond du lac provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Belmont | Fond du lac |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 3 |
White | 45 | 81 |
Asian | 30 | 3 |
Hispanic | 14 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Belmont vs Fond du lac
- In Fond du lac, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Belmont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fond du lac at 81% compared to 45% in Belmont.
- The Asian population is larger in Belmont at 30% compared to 3% in Fond du lac.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Belmont at 14% compared to 8% in Fond du lac.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Belmont at 9% compared to 5% in Fond du lac.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Belmont and Fond du lac at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Belmont | Fond du lac |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.2% | 15.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 10.5% |
Depression | 15.5% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 7.1% | 16.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 23.0% |
Obesity | 20.5% | 41.1% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Belmont vs Fond du lac
- In Fond du lac, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 12.2% in Belmont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fond du lac at 23.7% versus 15.5% in Belmont.
- Fond du lac has a higher smoking rate at 16.5% compared to 7.1% in Belmont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fond du lac at 23.0% compared to 17.0% in Belmont.
- Fond du lac has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 20.5% in Belmont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fond du lac at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Belmont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Belmont | Fond du lac |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (234) | 0.8% (370) |
High School Diploma | 6.0% (1,604) | 20.6% (9,143) |
Less than High School | 5.2% (1,394) | 11.8% (5,248) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 51.4% (13,763) | 14.5% (6,416) |
Education Levels Comparison: Belmont vs Fond du lac
- A higher percentage of residents in Belmont have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Fond du lac.
- In Fond du lac, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.6% compared to 6.0% in Belmont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fond du lac at 11.8%, compared to 5.2% in Belmont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Belmont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 14.5% in Fond du lac.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.