Demographics details for Bellingham, WA vs Pea ridge, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bellingham, WA vs Pea ridge, AR.
| Data | Bellingham | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,896 | 7,852 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $64,026 | $93,113 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bellingham vs Pea ridge
- In Bellingham, the population is higher at 93,896, compared to 7,852 in Pea ridge.
- The median age in Pea ridge is higher at 35.6 years, compared to 33.7 years in Bellingham.
- Pea ridge has a higher median income of $93,113, compared to $64,026 in Bellingham.
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 8% in Pea ridge.
- The unemployment rate in Bellingham is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Pea ridge.
Demographics
Demographics Bellingham vs Pea ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bellingham | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 74 | 70 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bellingham vs Pea ridge
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 70% in Pea ridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Bellingham at 6% compared to 1% in Pea ridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bellingham at 10% compared to 9% in Pea ridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pea ridge at 15%, compared to 8% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bellingham and Pea ridge at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bellingham | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 30.0% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 25.6% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bellingham vs Pea ridge
- In Pea ridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.6% in Bellingham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bellingham at 30.0% compared to 25.0% in Pea ridge.
- Pea ridge has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 14.1% in Bellingham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bellingham at 17.3% compared to 17.0% in Pea ridge.
- Pea ridge has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 25.6% in Bellingham.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Bellingham and Pea ridge at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bellingham | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (454) | 0.3% (23) |
| High School Diploma | 8.8% (8,220) | 17.7% (1,390) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (5,781) | 9.8% (773) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.9% (27,095) | 14.4% (1,131) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bellingham vs Pea ridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellingham have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Pea ridge.
- In Pea ridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 8.8% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pea ridge at 9.8%, compared to 6.2% in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellingham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 14.4% in Pea ridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.