Demographics details for Bellingham, WA vs Corsicana, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bellingham, WA vs Corsicana, TX.
Data | Bellingham | Corsicana |
---|---|---|
Population | 93,896 | 25,566 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 34.6 years |
Median Income | $64,026 | $49,353 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Bellingham vs Corsicana
- In Bellingham, the population is higher at 93,896, compared to 25,566 in Corsicana.
- The median age in Corsicana is higher at 34.6 years, compared to 33.7 years in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher median income of $64,026 compared to $49,353 in Corsicana.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Bellingham and Corsicana at 32.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Corsicana at 14%, compared to 11% in Bellingham.
- Corsicana has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.5% in Bellingham.
Demographics
Demographics Bellingham vs Corsicana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bellingham | Corsicana |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 17 |
White | 74 | 38 |
Asian | 6 | 1 |
Hispanic | 10 | 34 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 10 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bellingham vs Corsicana
- In Corsicana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 1% in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 38% in Corsicana.
- The Asian population is larger in Bellingham at 6% compared to 1% in Corsicana.
- Corsicana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 10% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Corsicana at 10%, compared to 8% in Bellingham.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bellingham at 1% compared to 0% in Corsicana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bellingham | Corsicana |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.6% |
Depression | 30.0% | 23.5% |
Smoking | 14.1% | 19.9% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 25.6% | 40.1% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bellingham vs Corsicana
- In Corsicana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.6% in Bellingham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bellingham at 30.0% compared to 23.5% in Corsicana.
- Corsicana has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 14.1% in Bellingham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bellingham at 17.3% compared to 16.8% in Corsicana.
- Corsicana has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 25.6% in Bellingham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Corsicana at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Bellingham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bellingham | Corsicana |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (454) | 3.7% (957) |
High School Diploma | 8.8% (8,220) | 14.2% (3,633) |
Less than High School | 6.2% (5,781) | 25.3% (6,461) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.9% (27,095) | 9.2% (2,357) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bellingham vs Corsicana
- In Corsicana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.5% in Bellingham.
- In Corsicana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 8.8% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corsicana at 25.3%, compared to 6.2% in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellingham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 9.2% in Corsicana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.