Demographics details for Bellingham, WA vs Chandler, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bellingham, WA vs Chandler, OK.
| Data | Bellingham | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,896 | 2,895 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $64,026 | $48,168 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bellingham vs Chandler
- In Bellingham, the population is higher at 93,896, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- The median age in Chandler is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 33.7 years in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher median income of $64,026 compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Bellingham.
- The poverty level is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 11% in Bellingham.
- The unemployment rate in Bellingham is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Bellingham vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bellingham | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 9 |
| White | 74 | 72 |
| Asian | 6 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Bellingham vs Chandler
- In Chandler, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 72% in Chandler.
- The Asian population is larger in Bellingham at 6% compared to 2% in Chandler.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bellingham at 10% compared to 1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 8% in Bellingham.
- In Chandler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Bellingham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bellingham | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 30.0% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 25.6% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bellingham vs Chandler
- In Chandler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.6% in Bellingham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bellingham at 30.0% compared to 24.6% in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 14.1% in Bellingham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bellingham at 17.3% compared to 14.6% in Chandler.
- Chandler has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 25.6% in Bellingham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Bellingham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bellingham | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (454) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 8.8% (8,220) | 23.9% (691) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (5,781) | 12.8% (372) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.9% (27,095) | 16.2% (469) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bellingham vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellingham have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 8.8% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chandler at 12.8%, compared to 6.2% in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellingham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 16.2% in Chandler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.