Demographics details for Bellingham, WA vs Burns, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bellingham, WA vs Burns, KS.
| Data | Bellingham | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,896 | 237 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 26.5 years |
| Median Income | $64,026 | $43,125 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Bellingham vs Burns
- In Bellingham, the population is higher at 93,896, compared to 237 in Burns.
- Residents in Bellingham have a higher median age of 33.7 years compared to 26.5 years in Burns.
- Bellingham has a higher median income of $64,026 compared to $43,125 in Burns.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bellingham at 32.0% compared to 31.0% in Burns.
- The poverty level is higher in Burns at 14%, compared to 11% in Bellingham.
- The unemployment rate in Bellingham is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.6% in Burns.
Demographics
Demographics Bellingham vs Burns provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bellingham | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 74 | 92 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bellingham vs Burns
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bellingham at 1% compared to 0% in Burns.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burns at 92% compared to 74% in Bellingham.
- The Asian population is larger in Bellingham at 6% compared to 0% in Burns.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bellingham at 10% compared to 6% in Burns.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bellingham at 8% compared to 2% in Burns.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bellingham at 1% compared to 0% in Burns.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bellingham | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 30.0% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 25.6% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bellingham vs Burns
- More residents in Bellingham report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.5% in Burns.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bellingham at 30.0% compared to 21.2% in Burns.
- Burns has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 14.1% in Bellingham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burns at 19.2% compared to 17.3% in Bellingham.
- Burns has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 25.6% in Bellingham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Burns at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Bellingham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bellingham | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (454) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 8.8% (8,220) | 13.9% (33) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (5,781) | 43.0% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.9% (27,095) | 6.3% (15) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bellingham vs Burns
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellingham have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Burns.
- In Burns, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 8.8% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burns at 43.0%, compared to 6.2% in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellingham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 6.3% in Burns.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.