Demographics details for Bellingham, WA vs Bridgeville, DE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bellingham, WA vs Bridgeville, DE.
Data | Bellingham | Bridgeville |
---|---|---|
Population | 93,896 | 2,752 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 57.3 years |
Median Income | $64,026 | $61,523 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Bellingham vs Bridgeville
- In Bellingham, the population is higher at 93,896, compared to 2,752 in Bridgeville.
- The median age in Bridgeville is higher at 57.3 years, compared to 33.7 years in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher median income of $64,026 compared to $61,523 in Bridgeville.
- In Bridgeville, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Bridgeville.
- The unemployment rate in Bellingham is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.8% in Bridgeville.
Demographics
Demographics Bellingham vs Bridgeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bellingham | Bridgeville |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 25 |
White | 74 | 60 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 10 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bellingham vs Bridgeville
- In Bridgeville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 1% in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 60% in Bridgeville.
- The Asian population is larger in Bellingham at 6% compared to 0% in Bridgeville.
- Bridgeville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 10% in Bellingham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bellingham at 8% compared to 4% in Bridgeville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bellingham at 1% compared to 0% in Bridgeville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bellingham | Bridgeville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.2% |
Depression | 30.0% | 18.8% |
Smoking | 14.1% | 18.9% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 25.6% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bellingham vs Bridgeville
- More residents in Bellingham report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in Bridgeville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bellingham at 30.0% compared to 18.8% in Bridgeville.
- Bridgeville has a higher smoking rate at 18.9% compared to 14.1% in Bellingham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bellingham at 17.3% compared to 15.2% in Bridgeville.
- Bridgeville has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 25.6% in Bellingham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bellingham at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Bridgeville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bellingham | Bridgeville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (454) | 0.5% (14) |
High School Diploma | 8.8% (8,220) | 17.6% (484) |
Less than High School | 6.2% (5,781) | 13.7% (378) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.9% (27,095) | 24.9% (686) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bellingham vs Bridgeville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Bellingham and Bridgeville at 0.5%.
- In Bridgeville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 8.8% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bridgeville at 13.7%, compared to 6.2% in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellingham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 24.9% in Bridgeville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.