Demographics details for Bellflower, CA vs Cambridge, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bellflower, CA vs Cambridge, MA.
| Data | Bellflower | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,405 | 118,488 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 30.6 years |
| Median Income | $75,379 | $121,539 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Bellflower vs Cambridge
- The population in Cambridge is higher at 118,488, compared to 76,405 in Bellflower.
- Residents in Bellflower have a higher median age of 35.5 years compared to 30.6 years in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher median income of $121,539, compared to $75,379 in Bellflower.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bellflower at 34.0% compared to 29.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is identical in both Bellflower and Cambridge at 14%.
- The unemployment rate in Bellflower is higher at 6.2%, compared to 3.3% in Cambridge.
Demographics
Demographics Bellflower vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bellflower | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 11 |
| White | -3 | 53 |
| Asian | 12 | 19 |
| Hispanic | 62 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bellflower vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bellflower at 13% compared to 11% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cambridge at 53% compared to -3% in Bellflower.
- In Cambridge, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 12% in Bellflower.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bellflower at 62% compared to 9% in Cambridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bellflower at 15% compared to 8% in Cambridge.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bellflower at 1% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bellflower | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 12.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 7.6% |
| Depression | 15.9% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 12.2% | 8.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 23.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bellflower vs Cambridge
- More residents in Bellflower report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 12.8% in Cambridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 19.2% versus 15.9% in Bellflower.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bellflower at 12.2% compared to 8.1% in Cambridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cambridge at 17.7% compared to 14.7% in Bellflower.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bellflower at 30.2% compared to 23.8% in Cambridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bellflower at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Cambridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bellflower | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.8% (2,888) | 0.9% (1,031) |
| High School Diploma | 15.5% (11,834) | 3.7% (4,373) |
| Less than High School | 28.9% (22,107) | 4.6% (5,440) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (10,396) | 54.0% (63,931) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bellflower vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellflower have no formal schooling at 3.8% compared to 0.9% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellflower hold a high school diploma at 15.5% compared to 3.7% in Cambridge.
- More residents in Bellflower have less than a high school education at 28.9% compared to 4.6% in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.0% compared to 13.6% in Bellflower.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.