Demographics details for Bellevue, WA vs Washington, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bellevue, WA vs Washington, KS.
Data | Bellevue | Washington |
---|---|---|
Population | 152,767 | 5,501 |
Median Age | 38.3 years | 44.9 years |
Median Income | $149,551 | $59,432 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Bellevue vs Washington
- In Bellevue, the population is higher at 152,767, compared to 5,501 in Washington.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 38.3 years in Bellevue.
- Bellevue has a higher median income of $149,551 compared to $59,432 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bellevue at 47.0% compared to 46.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 12%, compared to 6% in Bellevue.
- The unemployment rate in Bellevue is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.0% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Bellevue vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bellevue | Washington |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 42 | 93 |
Asian | 39 | 1 |
Hispanic | 8 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bellevue vs Washington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bellevue at 3% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 93% compared to 42% in Bellevue.
- The Asian population is larger in Bellevue at 39% compared to 1% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bellevue at 8% compared to 4% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bellevue at 8% compared to 2% in Washington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bellevue and Washington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bellevue | Washington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 10.1% |
Depression | 21.1% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 7.1% | 18.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 20.4% |
Obesity | 20.6% | 42.1% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bellevue vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 13.2% in Bellevue.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bellevue at 21.1% compared to 20.9% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 7.1% in Bellevue.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 20.4% compared to 16.7% in Bellevue.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 20.6% in Bellevue.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Bellevue.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bellevue | Washington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (1,085) | 0.8% (45) |
High School Diploma | 5.5% (8,350) | 24.9% (1,368) |
Less than High School | 4.9% (7,415) | 9.0% (494) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 50.6% (77,279) | 15.8% (869) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bellevue vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Bellevue.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 5.5% in Bellevue.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 9.0%, compared to 4.9% in Bellevue.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellevue hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.6% compared to 15.8% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.