Demographics details for Bellevue, WA vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bellevue, WA vs Spanish fork, UT.
Data | Bellevue | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 152,767 | 44,102 |
Median Age | 38.3 years | 27.4 years |
Median Income | $149,551 | $93,989 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Bellevue vs Spanish fork
- In Bellevue, the population is higher at 152,767, compared to 44,102 in Spanish fork.
- Residents in Bellevue have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Bellevue has a higher median income of $149,551 compared to $93,989 in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bellevue at 47.0% compared to 43.0% in Spanish fork.
- The poverty level is identical in both Bellevue and Spanish fork at 6%.
- The unemployment rate in Bellevue is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.
Demographics
Demographics Bellevue vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bellevue | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 42 | 80 |
Asian | 39 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bellevue vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bellevue at 3% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spanish fork at 80% compared to 42% in Bellevue.
- The Asian population is larger in Bellevue at 39% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 8% in Bellevue.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bellevue at 8% compared to 7% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bellevue and Spanish fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bellevue | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 10.8% |
Depression | 21.1% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 7.1% | 7.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 8.3% |
Obesity | 20.6% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bellevue vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 13.2% in Bellevue.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 21.1% in Bellevue.
- Spanish fork has a higher smoking rate at 7.7% compared to 7.1% in Bellevue.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bellevue at 16.7% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has higher obesity rates at 31.0% compared to 20.6% in Bellevue.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Bellevue and Spanish fork at 8.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bellevue | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (1,085) | 0.4% (175) |
High School Diploma | 5.5% (8,350) | 9.1% (4,010) |
Less than High School | 4.9% (7,415) | 5.9% (2,583) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 50.6% (77,279) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bellevue vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellevue have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.1% compared to 5.5% in Bellevue.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spanish fork at 5.9%, compared to 4.9% in Bellevue.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellevue hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.6% compared to 19.4% in Spanish fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.