Demographics details for Bella vista, AR vs Parksley, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bella vista, AR vs Parksley, VA.
Data | Bella vista | Parksley |
---|---|---|
Population | 31,733 | 808 |
Median Age | 50.2 years | 43.6 years |
Median Income | $83,989 | $74,844 |
Married Families | 54.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Bella vista vs Parksley
- In Bella vista, the population is higher at 31,733, compared to 808 in Parksley.
- Residents in Bella vista have a higher median age of 50.2 years compared to 43.6 years in Parksley.
- Bella vista has a higher median income of $83,989 compared to $74,844 in Parksley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bella vista at 54.0% compared to 31.0% in Parksley.
- The poverty level is higher in Parksley at 9%, compared to 7% in Bella vista.
- Parksley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Bella vista.
Demographics
Demographics Bella vista vs Parksley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bella vista | Parksley |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 35 |
White | 84 | 46 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 13 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bella vista vs Parksley
- In Parksley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 0% in Bella vista.
- Bella vista has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 46% in Parksley.
- The Asian population is larger in Bella vista at 1% compared to 0% in Parksley.
- Parksley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 4% in Bella vista.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bella vista at 10% compared to 6% in Parksley.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bella vista at 1% compared to 0% in Parksley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bella vista | Parksley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 18.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 14.4% |
Depression | 24.0% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 14.4% | 22.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 33.0% | 40.0% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bella vista vs Parksley
- In Parksley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.4% in Bella vista.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bella vista at 24.0% compared to 23.3% in Parksley.
- Parksley has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 14.4% in Bella vista.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bella vista at 17.6% compared to 15.6% in Parksley.
- Parksley has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 33.0% in Bella vista.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bella vista at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Parksley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bella vista | Parksley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (110) | 2.0% (16) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (5,393) | 19.1% (154) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (1,884) | 22.3% (180) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.5% (8,730) | 17.9% (145) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bella vista vs Parksley
- In Parksley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.3% in Bella vista.
- In Parksley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 17.0% in Bella vista.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parksley at 22.3%, compared to 5.9% in Bella vista.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bella vista hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.5% compared to 17.9% in Parksley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.