Demographics details for Bell gardens, CA vs Weatherford, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bell gardens, CA vs Weatherford, OK.
Data | Bell gardens | Weatherford |
---|---|---|
Population | 37,927 | 11,859 |
Median Age | 31.1 years | 23.9 years |
Median Income | $53,935 | $47,851 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bell gardens vs Weatherford
- In Bell gardens, the population is higher at 37,927, compared to 11,859 in Weatherford.
- Residents in Bell gardens have a higher median age of 31.1 years compared to 23.9 years in Weatherford.
- Bell gardens has a higher median income of $53,935 compared to $47,851 in Weatherford.
- In Weatherford, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 27.0% in Bell gardens.
- The poverty level is identical in both Bell gardens and Weatherford at 15%.
- The unemployment rate in Bell gardens is higher at 6.7%, compared to 3.5% in Weatherford.
Demographics
Demographics Bell gardens vs Weatherford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bell gardens | Weatherford |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 3 |
White | -35 | 66 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 99 | 14 |
Two or More Races | 34 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Bell gardens vs Weatherford
- In Weatherford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Bell gardens.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Weatherford at 66% compared to -35% in Bell gardens.
- In Weatherford, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Bell gardens.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bell gardens at 99% compared to 14% in Weatherford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bell gardens at 34% compared to 11% in Weatherford.
- In Weatherford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Bell gardens.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bell gardens | Weatherford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 17.9% | 12.3% |
Depression | 17.5% | 25.5% |
Smoking | 16.2% | 18.6% |
Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 14.4% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 44.1% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bell gardens vs Weatherford
- More residents in Bell gardens report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.6% in Weatherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Weatherford at 25.5% versus 17.5% in Bell gardens.
- Weatherford has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 16.2% in Bell gardens.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Weatherford at 14.4% compared to 13.3% in Bell gardens.
- Weatherford has higher obesity rates at 44.1% compared to 37.2% in Bell gardens.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Weatherford at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Bell gardens.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bell gardens | Weatherford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.5% (1,722) | 0.4% (48) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (6,418) | 9.1% (1,082) |
Less than High School | 60.8% (23,053) | 5.2% (621) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.9% (1,476) | 18.9% (2,246) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bell gardens vs Weatherford
- A higher percentage of residents in Bell gardens have no formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.4% in Weatherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bell gardens hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 9.1% in Weatherford.
- More residents in Bell gardens have less than a high school education at 60.8% compared to 5.2% in Weatherford.
- In Weatherford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 3.9% in Bell gardens.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.