Demographics details for Bell gardens, CA vs Stillwater, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bell gardens, CA vs Stillwater, MN.
Data | Bell gardens | Stillwater |
---|---|---|
Population | 37,927 | 19,276 |
Median Age | 31.1 years | 41.8 years |
Median Income | $53,935 | $107,986 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bell gardens vs Stillwater
- In Bell gardens, the population is higher at 37,927, compared to 19,276 in Stillwater.
- The median age in Stillwater is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 31.1 years in Bell gardens.
- Stillwater has a higher median income of $107,986, compared to $53,935 in Bell gardens.
- In Stillwater, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 27.0% in Bell gardens.
- Bell gardens has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The unemployment rate in Bell gardens is higher at 6.7%, compared to 3.5% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Bell gardens vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bell gardens | Stillwater |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 3 |
White | -35 | 83 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 99 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 34 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bell gardens vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Bell gardens.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stillwater at 83% compared to -35% in Bell gardens.
- In Stillwater, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Bell gardens.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bell gardens at 99% compared to 7% in Stillwater.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bell gardens at 34% compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bell gardens at 1% compared to 0% in Stillwater.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bell gardens | Stillwater |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 13.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 17.9% | 7.8% |
Depression | 17.5% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 16.2% | 13.0% |
Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 21.5% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 31.5% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bell gardens vs Stillwater
- More residents in Bell gardens report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 13.5% in Stillwater.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stillwater at 23.3% versus 17.5% in Bell gardens.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bell gardens at 16.2% compared to 13.0% in Stillwater.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stillwater at 21.5% compared to 13.3% in Bell gardens.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bell gardens at 37.2% compared to 31.5% in Stillwater.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stillwater at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Bell gardens.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bell gardens | Stillwater |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.5% (1,722) | 1.0% (186) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (6,418) | 11.9% (2,297) |
Less than High School | 60.8% (23,053) | 4.0% (778) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.9% (1,476) | 34.4% (6,634) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bell gardens vs Stillwater
- A higher percentage of residents in Bell gardens have no formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 1.0% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bell gardens hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 11.9% in Stillwater.
- More residents in Bell gardens have less than a high school education at 60.8% compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 3.9% in Bell gardens.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.