Demographics details for Bell gardens, CA vs Maquoketa, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bell gardens, CA vs Maquoketa, IA.
| Data | Bell gardens | Maquoketa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,927 | 6,054 |
| Median Age | 31.1 years | 40.8 years |
| Median Income | $53,935 | $53,462 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Bell gardens vs Maquoketa
- In Bell gardens, the population is higher at 37,927, compared to 6,054 in Maquoketa.
- The median age in Maquoketa is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 31.1 years in Bell gardens.
- Bell gardens has a higher median income of $53,935 compared to $53,462 in Maquoketa.
- In Maquoketa, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 27.0% in Bell gardens.
- Bell gardens has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Maquoketa.
- The unemployment rate in Bell gardens is higher at 6.7%, compared to 3.2% in Maquoketa.
Demographics
Demographics Bell gardens vs Maquoketa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bell gardens | Maquoketa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | -35 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 99 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 34 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bell gardens vs Maquoketa
- In Maquoketa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Bell gardens.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Maquoketa at 96% compared to -35% in Bell gardens.
- Both Bell gardens and Maquoketa have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bell gardens at 99% compared to 1% in Maquoketa.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bell gardens at 34% compared to 1% in Maquoketa.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bell gardens at 1% compared to 0% in Maquoketa.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bell gardens | Maquoketa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.9% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 20.7% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 39.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bell gardens vs Maquoketa
- More residents in Bell gardens report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.9% in Maquoketa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Maquoketa at 20.5% versus 17.5% in Bell gardens.
- Maquoketa has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 16.2% in Bell gardens.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Maquoketa at 20.7% compared to 13.3% in Bell gardens.
- Maquoketa has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 37.2% in Bell gardens.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Maquoketa at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Bell gardens.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bell gardens | Maquoketa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.5% (1,722) | 0.2% (12) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (6,418) | 28.0% (1,696) |
| Less than High School | 60.8% (23,053) | 5.3% (323) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.9% (1,476) | 11.1% (673) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bell gardens vs Maquoketa
- A higher percentage of residents in Bell gardens have no formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.2% in Maquoketa.
- In Maquoketa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.0% compared to 16.9% in Bell gardens.
- More residents in Bell gardens have less than a high school education at 60.8% compared to 5.3% in Maquoketa.
- In Maquoketa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 3.9% in Bell gardens.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.