Demographics details for Bell gardens, CA vs Friendship, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bell gardens, CA vs Friendship, WI.

Data Bell gardens Friendship
Population 37,927 681
Median Age 31.1 years 50.3 years
Median Income $53,935 $45,208
Married Families 27.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 15% 12%
Unemployment Rate 6.7 4.5

Population Comparison: Bell gardens vs Friendship

  • In Bell gardens, the population is higher at 37,927, compared to 681 in Friendship.
  • The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 31.1 years in Bell gardens.
  • Bell gardens has a higher median income of $53,935 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
  • In Friendship, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 27.0% in Bell gardens.
  • Bell gardens has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Friendship.
  • The unemployment rate in Bell gardens is higher at 6.7%, compared to 4.5% in Friendship.

Demographics

Demographics Bell gardens vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bell gardens Friendship
Black 1 5
White -35 84
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 99 1
Two or More Races 34 9
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Bell gardens vs Friendship

  • In Friendship, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Bell gardens.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Friendship at 84% compared to -35% in Bell gardens.
  • Both Bell gardens and Friendship have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Bell gardens at 99% compared to 1% in Friendship.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Bell gardens at 34% compared to 9% in Friendship.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bell gardens and Friendship at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bell gardens Friendship
Mental Health Not Good 18.9% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 17.9% 12.4%
Depression 17.5% 24.3%
Smoking 16.2% 21.6%
Binge Drinking 13.3% 23.9%
Obesity 37.2% 39.3%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bell gardens vs Friendship

  • More residents in Bell gardens report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Friendship at 24.3% versus 17.5% in Bell gardens.
  • Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 16.2% in Bell gardens.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 13.3% in Bell gardens.
  • Friendship has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 37.2% in Bell gardens.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Friendship at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Bell gardens.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bell gardens Friendship
No Schooling 4.5% (1,722) 0.4% (3)
High School Diploma 16.9% (6,418) 26.9% (183)
Less than High School 60.8% (23,053) 26.0% (177)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 3.9% (1,476) 3.2% (22)

Education Levels Comparison: Bell gardens vs Friendship

  • A higher percentage of residents in Bell gardens have no formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.4% in Friendship.
  • In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 16.9% in Bell gardens.
  • More residents in Bell gardens have less than a high school education at 60.8% compared to 26.0% in Friendship.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bell gardens hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.