Demographics details for Bell gardens, CA vs Friendship, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bell gardens, CA vs Friendship, WI.
Data | Bell gardens | Friendship |
---|---|---|
Population | 37,927 | 681 |
Median Age | 31.1 years | 50.3 years |
Median Income | $53,935 | $45,208 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Bell gardens vs Friendship
- In Bell gardens, the population is higher at 37,927, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 31.1 years in Bell gardens.
- Bell gardens has a higher median income of $53,935 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- In Friendship, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 27.0% in Bell gardens.
- Bell gardens has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Friendship.
- The unemployment rate in Bell gardens is higher at 6.7%, compared to 4.5% in Friendship.
Demographics
Demographics Bell gardens vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bell gardens | Friendship |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 5 |
White | -35 | 84 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 99 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 34 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bell gardens vs Friendship
- In Friendship, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Bell gardens.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Friendship at 84% compared to -35% in Bell gardens.
- Both Bell gardens and Friendship have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bell gardens at 99% compared to 1% in Friendship.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bell gardens at 34% compared to 9% in Friendship.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bell gardens and Friendship at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bell gardens | Friendship |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 17.9% | 12.4% |
Depression | 17.5% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 16.2% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 23.9% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 39.3% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bell gardens vs Friendship
- More residents in Bell gardens report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Friendship at 24.3% versus 17.5% in Bell gardens.
- Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 16.2% in Bell gardens.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 13.3% in Bell gardens.
- Friendship has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 37.2% in Bell gardens.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Friendship at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Bell gardens.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bell gardens | Friendship |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.5% (1,722) | 0.4% (3) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (6,418) | 26.9% (183) |
Less than High School | 60.8% (23,053) | 26.0% (177) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.9% (1,476) | 3.2% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bell gardens vs Friendship
- A higher percentage of residents in Bell gardens have no formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.4% in Friendship.
- In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 16.9% in Bell gardens.
- More residents in Bell gardens have less than a high school education at 60.8% compared to 26.0% in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bell gardens hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.