Demographics details for Bell gardens, CA vs Convent, LA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bell gardens, CA vs Convent, LA.

Data Bell gardens Convent
Population 37,927 552
Median Age 31.1 years 24.2 years
Median Income $53,935 $41,042
Married Families 27.0% 16.0%
Poverty Level 15% 15%
Unemployment Rate 6.7 4.5

Population Comparison: Bell gardens vs Convent

  • In Bell gardens, the population is higher at 37,927, compared to 552 in Convent.
  • Residents in Bell gardens have a higher median age of 31.1 years compared to 24.2 years in Convent.
  • Bell gardens has a higher median income of $53,935 compared to $41,042 in Convent.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Bell gardens at 27.0% compared to 16.0% in Convent.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Bell gardens and Convent at 15%.
  • The unemployment rate in Bell gardens is higher at 6.7%, compared to 4.5% in Convent.

Demographics

Demographics Bell gardens vs Convent provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bell gardens Convent
Black 1 74
White -35 26
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 99 Data is updating
Two or More Races 34 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bell gardens vs Convent

  • In Convent, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 74% compared to 1% in Bell gardens.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Convent at 26% compared to -35% in Bell gardens.
  • Both Bell gardens and Convent have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Bell gardens at 99% compared to 0% in Convent.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Bell gardens at 34% compared to 0% in Convent.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bell gardens at 1% compared to 0% in Convent.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bell gardens Convent
Mental Health Not Good 18.9% 19.8%
Physical Health Not Good 17.9% 14.8%
Depression 17.5% 23.4%
Smoking 16.2% 24.6%
Binge Drinking 13.3% 16.2%
Obesity 37.2% 43.3%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bell gardens vs Convent

  • In Convent, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.9% in Bell gardens.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Convent at 23.4% versus 17.5% in Bell gardens.
  • Convent has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 16.2% in Bell gardens.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Convent at 16.2% compared to 13.3% in Bell gardens.
  • Convent has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 37.2% in Bell gardens.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Bell gardens and Convent at 7.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bell gardens Convent
No Schooling 4.5% (1,722) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.9% (6,418) 17.9% (99)
Less than High School 60.8% (23,053) 6.7% (37)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 3.9% (1,476) 8.9% (49)

Education Levels Comparison: Bell gardens vs Convent

  • A higher percentage of residents in Bell gardens have no formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.0% in Convent.
  • In Convent, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 16.9% in Bell gardens.
  • More residents in Bell gardens have less than a high school education at 60.8% compared to 6.7% in Convent.
  • In Convent, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.9% compared to 3.9% in Bell gardens.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.