Demographics details for Belknap, IL vs Paxton, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Belknap, IL vs Paxton, MA.
| Data | Belknap | Paxton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 88 | 4,963 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $97,500 | $110,000 |
| Married Families | 55.0% | 83.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Belknap vs Paxton
- The population in Paxton is higher at 4,963, compared to 88 in Belknap.
- The median age in Paxton is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 40.5 years in Belknap.
- Paxton has a higher median income of $110,000, compared to $97,500 in Belknap.
- In Paxton, the percentage of married families is higher at 83.0%, compared to 55.0% in Belknap.
- Belknap has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Paxton.
- The unemployment rate in Belknap is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.7% in Paxton.
Demographics
Demographics Belknap vs Paxton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Belknap | Paxton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 97 | 93 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Belknap vs Paxton
- In Paxton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Belknap.
- Belknap has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 93% in Paxton.
- In Paxton, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Belknap.
- Paxton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Belknap.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Belknap at 3% compared to 1% in Paxton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Belknap and Paxton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Belknap | Paxton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 25.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 21.2% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Belknap vs Paxton
- More residents in Belknap report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Paxton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Belknap at 25.6% compared to 0.0% in Paxton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Belknap at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Paxton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Belknap at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Paxton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Belknap at 39.4% compared to 0.0% in Paxton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Belknap at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Paxton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Belknap | Paxton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 29.5% (26) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 38.6% (34) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.3% (24) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Belknap vs Paxton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Belknap and Paxton at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Belknap hold a high school diploma at 29.5% compared to 0.0% in Paxton.
- More residents in Belknap have less than a high school education at 38.6% compared to 0.0% in Paxton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Belknap hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.3% compared to 0.0% in Paxton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.