Demographics details for Belgrade, MT vs New london, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Belgrade, MT vs New london, CT.
| Data | Belgrade | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,966 | 27,980 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 35.5 years |
| Median Income | $82,769 | $56,237 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Belgrade vs New london
- The population in New london is higher at 27,980, compared to 11,966 in Belgrade.
- The median age in New london is higher at 35.5 years, compared to 33.4 years in Belgrade.
- Belgrade has a higher median income of $82,769 compared to $56,237 in New london.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Belgrade at 36.0% compared to 24.0% in New london.
- The poverty level is higher in New london at 12%, compared to 6% in Belgrade.
- New london has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Belgrade.
Demographics
Demographics Belgrade vs New london provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Belgrade | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 17 |
| White | 93 | 41 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Belgrade vs New london
- In New london, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Belgrade.
- Belgrade has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 41% in New london.
- In New london, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Belgrade.
- New london has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 2% in Belgrade.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New london at 11%, compared to 3% in Belgrade.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Belgrade at 1% compared to 0% in New london.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Belgrade | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.9% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 24.6% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Belgrade vs New london
- In New london, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.8% in Belgrade.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New london at 23.3% versus 23.1% in Belgrade.
- New london has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 14.1% in Belgrade.
- Binge drinking is more common in Belgrade at 23.9% compared to 15.2% in New london.
- New london has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 24.6% in Belgrade.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New london at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Belgrade.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Belgrade | New london |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (25) | 1.4% (399) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (1,727) | 16.0% (4,487) |
| Less than High School | 2.5% (301) | 13.7% (3,830) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (2,670) | 16.9% (4,738) |
Education Levels Comparison: Belgrade vs New london
- In New london, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.2% in Belgrade.
- In New london, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 14.4% in Belgrade.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New london at 13.7%, compared to 2.5% in Belgrade.
- A higher percentage of residents in Belgrade hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 16.9% in New london.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.