Demographics details for Belgrade, MT vs Fountain hills, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Belgrade, MT vs Fountain hills, AZ.

Data Belgrade Fountain hills
Population 11,966 23,785
Median Age 33.4 years 60.2 years
Median Income $82,769 $100,317
Married Families 36.0% 58.0%
Poverty Level 6% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Belgrade vs Fountain hills

  • The population in Fountain hills is higher at 23,785, compared to 11,966 in Belgrade.
  • The median age in Fountain hills is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 33.4 years in Belgrade.
  • Fountain hills has a higher median income of $100,317, compared to $82,769 in Belgrade.
  • In Fountain hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 36.0% in Belgrade.
  • Belgrade has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Fountain hills.
  • The unemployment rate in Belgrade is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Fountain hills.

Demographics

Demographics Belgrade vs Fountain hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Belgrade Fountain hills
Black Data is updating 2
White 93 89
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 2 3
Two or More Races 3 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Belgrade vs Fountain hills

  • In Fountain hills, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Belgrade.
  • Belgrade has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 89% in Fountain hills.
  • In Fountain hills, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Belgrade.
  • Fountain hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Belgrade.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fountain hills at 4%, compared to 3% in Belgrade.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Belgrade at 1% compared to 0% in Fountain hills.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Belgrade Fountain hills
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 9.4% 8.0%
Depression 23.1% 19.7%
Smoking 14.1% 10.7%
Binge Drinking 23.9% 19.8%
Obesity 24.6% 26.5%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Belgrade vs Fountain hills

  • In Fountain hills, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.8% in Belgrade.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Belgrade at 23.1% compared to 19.7% in Fountain hills.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Belgrade at 14.1% compared to 10.7% in Fountain hills.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Belgrade at 23.9% compared to 19.8% in Fountain hills.
  • Fountain hills has higher obesity rates at 26.5% compared to 24.6% in Belgrade.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fountain hills at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Belgrade.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Belgrade Fountain hills
No Schooling 0.2% (25) 0.4% (88)
High School Diploma 14.4% (1,727) 11.7% (2,782)
Less than High School 2.5% (301) 3.7% (876)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (2,670) 42.2% (10,044)

Education Levels Comparison: Belgrade vs Fountain hills

  • In Fountain hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Belgrade.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Belgrade hold a high school diploma at 14.4% compared to 11.7% in Fountain hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fountain hills at 3.7%, compared to 2.5% in Belgrade.
  • In Fountain hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 22.3% in Belgrade.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.