Demographics details for Belgrade, MT vs Cullman, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Belgrade, MT vs Cullman, AL.
| Data | Belgrade | Cullman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,966 | 19,251 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $82,769 | $59,982 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Belgrade vs Cullman
- The population in Cullman is higher at 19,251, compared to 11,966 in Belgrade.
- The median age in Cullman is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 33.4 years in Belgrade.
- Belgrade has a higher median income of $82,769 compared to $59,982 in Cullman.
- In Cullman, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 36.0% in Belgrade.
- The poverty level is higher in Cullman at 12%, compared to 6% in Belgrade.
- Cullman has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Belgrade.
Demographics
Demographics Belgrade vs Cullman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Belgrade | Cullman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 93 | 92 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Belgrade vs Cullman
- In Cullman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Belgrade.
- Belgrade has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 92% in Cullman.
- Both Belgrade and Cullman have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Belgrade and Cullman at 2%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cullman at 4%, compared to 3% in Belgrade.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Belgrade at 1% compared to 0% in Cullman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Belgrade | Cullman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.9% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 24.6% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Belgrade vs Cullman
- In Cullman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 14.8% in Belgrade.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cullman at 24.9% versus 23.1% in Belgrade.
- Cullman has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 14.1% in Belgrade.
- Binge drinking is more common in Belgrade at 23.9% compared to 16.4% in Cullman.
- Cullman has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 24.6% in Belgrade.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cullman at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Belgrade.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Belgrade | Cullman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (25) | 0.7% (130) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (1,727) | 13.6% (2,614) |
| Less than High School | 2.5% (301) | 13.0% (2,512) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (2,670) | 22.1% (4,253) |
Education Levels Comparison: Belgrade vs Cullman
- In Cullman, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Belgrade.
- A higher percentage of residents in Belgrade hold a high school diploma at 14.4% compared to 13.6% in Cullman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cullman at 13.0%, compared to 2.5% in Belgrade.
- A higher percentage of residents in Belgrade hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 22.1% in Cullman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.