Demographics details for Beecher city, IL vs Riverside, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Beecher city, IL vs Riverside, CA.

Data Beecher city Riverside
Population 423 320,764
Median Age 36.9 years 32.4 years
Median Income $39,297 $83,448
Married Families 27.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 14% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.9

Population Comparison: Beecher city vs Riverside

  • The population in Riverside is higher at 320,764, compared to 423 in Beecher city.
  • Residents in Beecher city have a higher median age of 36.9 years compared to 32.4 years in Riverside.
  • Riverside has a higher median income of $83,448, compared to $39,297 in Beecher city.
  • In Riverside, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 27.0% in Beecher city.
  • Beecher city has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Riverside.
  • Riverside has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.2% in Beecher city.

Demographics

Demographics Beecher city vs Riverside provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Beecher city Riverside
Black Data is updating 6
White 99 18
Asian Data is updating 8
Hispanic Data is updating 55
Two or More Races 1 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Beecher city vs Riverside

  • In Riverside, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Beecher city.
  • Beecher city has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 18% in Riverside.
  • In Riverside, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Beecher city.
  • Riverside has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 0% in Beecher city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Riverside at 12%, compared to 1% in Beecher city.
  • In Riverside, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Beecher city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Beecher city Riverside
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 16.0%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 11.7%
Depression 21.4% 17.1%
Smoking 14.8% 13.2%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 16.1%
Obesity 34.0% 36.2%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Beecher city vs Riverside

  • In Riverside, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.2% in Beecher city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Beecher city at 21.4% compared to 17.1% in Riverside.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Beecher city at 14.8% compared to 13.2% in Riverside.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Beecher city at 18.8% compared to 16.1% in Riverside.
  • Riverside has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 34.0% in Beecher city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Beecher city at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverside.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Beecher city Riverside
No Schooling 0.7% (3) 2.0% (6,286)
High School Diploma 23.6% (100) 15.7% (50,271)
Less than High School 17.5% (74) 20.3% (64,976)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.1% (30) 14.9% (47,929)

Education Levels Comparison: Beecher city vs Riverside

  • In Riverside, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.7% in Beecher city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beecher city hold a high school diploma at 23.6% compared to 15.7% in Riverside.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Riverside at 20.3%, compared to 17.5% in Beecher city.
  • In Riverside, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 7.1% in Beecher city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.