Demographics details for Beecher city, IL vs Mcminnville, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Beecher city, IL vs Mcminnville, OR.

Data Beecher city Mcminnville
Population 423 34,530
Median Age 36.9 years 40.1 years
Median Income $39,297 $65,318
Married Families 27.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 14% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.9

Population Comparison: Beecher city vs Mcminnville

  • The population in Mcminnville is higher at 34,530, compared to 423 in Beecher city.
  • The median age in Mcminnville is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 36.9 years in Beecher city.
  • Mcminnville has a higher median income of $65,318, compared to $39,297 in Beecher city.
  • In Mcminnville, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 27.0% in Beecher city.
  • Beecher city has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Mcminnville.
  • Mcminnville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Beecher city.

Demographics

Demographics Beecher city vs Mcminnville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Beecher city Mcminnville
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 99 67
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 18
Two or More Races 1 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Beecher city vs Mcminnville

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Beecher city and Mcminnville at 0%.
  • Beecher city has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 67% in Mcminnville.
  • In Mcminnville, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Beecher city.
  • Mcminnville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 0% in Beecher city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mcminnville at 12%, compared to 1% in Beecher city.
  • In Mcminnville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Beecher city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Beecher city Mcminnville
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 11.6%
Depression 21.4% 27.2%
Smoking 14.8% 15.6%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 17.6%
Obesity 34.0% 35.1%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Beecher city vs Mcminnville

  • In Mcminnville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.2% in Beecher city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mcminnville at 27.2% versus 21.4% in Beecher city.
  • Mcminnville has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 14.8% in Beecher city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Beecher city at 18.8% compared to 17.6% in Mcminnville.
  • Mcminnville has higher obesity rates at 35.1% compared to 34.0% in Beecher city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mcminnville at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Beecher city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Beecher city Mcminnville
No Schooling 0.7% (3) 1.4% (472)
High School Diploma 23.6% (100) 11.9% (4,114)
Less than High School 17.5% (74) 16.8% (5,808)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.1% (30) 17.7% (6,118)

Education Levels Comparison: Beecher city vs Mcminnville

  • In Mcminnville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Beecher city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beecher city hold a high school diploma at 23.6% compared to 11.9% in Mcminnville.
  • More residents in Beecher city have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 16.8% in Mcminnville.
  • In Mcminnville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 7.1% in Beecher city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.