Demographics details for Beebe, AR vs Palos park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beebe, AR vs Palos park, IL.
| Data | Beebe | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,718 | 4,792 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 59.5 years |
| Median Income | $55,072 | $128,370 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Beebe vs Palos park
- In Beebe, the population is higher at 8,718, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
- The median age in Palos park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 34.5 years in Beebe.
- Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370, compared to $55,072 in Beebe.
- In Palos park, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 35.0% in Beebe.
- Beebe has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Palos park.
- Palos park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Beebe.
Demographics
Demographics Beebe vs Palos park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beebe | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 91 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Beebe vs Palos park
- In Palos park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Beebe.
- Beebe has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 88% in Palos park.
- In Palos park, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Beebe.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Beebe and Palos park at 3%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Palos park at 5%, compared to 4% in Beebe.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beebe and Palos park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beebe | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 21.0% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 20.8% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 26.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beebe vs Palos park
- More residents in Beebe report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Beebe at 26.1% compared to 18.5% in Palos park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Beebe at 21.0% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 15.1% in Beebe.
- Obesity rates are higher in Beebe at 35.8% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Beebe at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beebe | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (137) | 1.1% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (1,239) | 18.2% (870) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (1,268) | 6.0% (287) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (1,076) | 42.1% (2,018) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beebe vs Palos park
- A higher percentage of residents in Beebe have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.1% in Palos park.
- In Palos park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 14.2% in Beebe.
- More residents in Beebe have less than a high school education at 14.5% compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
- In Palos park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 12.3% in Beebe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.