Demographics details for Bee, NE vs Roaring river, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bee, NE vs Roaring river, NC.
Data | Bee | Roaring river |
---|---|---|
Population | 169 | 1,000 |
Median Age | 35.9 years | 35.0 years |
Median Income | $63,750 | $60,000 |
Married Families | 68.0% | 500.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Bee vs Roaring river
- The population in Roaring river is higher at 1,000, compared to 169 in Bee.
- Residents in Bee have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 35.0 years in Roaring river.
- Bee has a higher median income of $63,750 compared to $60,000 in Roaring river.
- In Roaring river, the percentage of married families is higher at 500.0%, compared to 68.0% in Bee.
- The poverty level is higher in Roaring river at 12%, compared to 5% in Bee.
- Roaring river has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.5% in Bee.
Demographics
Demographics Bee vs Roaring river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bee | Roaring river |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 5 |
White | 99 | 90 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bee vs Roaring river
- In Roaring river, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Bee.
- Bee has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 90% in Roaring river.
- In Roaring river, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Bee.
- Roaring river has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Bee.
- Both Bee and Roaring river have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bee and Roaring river at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bee | Roaring river |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.3% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 16.7% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 13.6% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 22.4% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 35.0% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 37.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bee vs Roaring river
- More residents in Bee report poor mental health at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bee at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bee at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bee at 22.4% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bee at 35.0% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bee at 37.0% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bee | Roaring river |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (2) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 26.6% (45) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 8.3% (14) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (17) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bee vs Roaring river
- A higher percentage of residents in Bee have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bee hold a high school diploma at 26.6% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- More residents in Bee have less than a high school education at 8.3% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bee hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.