Demographics details for Bee, NE vs Peachtree corners, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bee, NE vs Peachtree corners, GA.
Data | Bee | Peachtree corners |
---|---|---|
Population | 169 | 42,133 |
Median Age | 35.9 years | 35.5 years |
Median Income | $63,750 | $74,716 |
Married Families | 68.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Bee vs Peachtree corners
- The population in Peachtree corners is higher at 42,133, compared to 169 in Bee.
- Residents in Bee have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 35.5 years in Peachtree corners.
- Peachtree corners has a higher median income of $74,716, compared to $63,750 in Bee.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bee at 68.0% compared to 41.0% in Peachtree corners.
- The poverty level is identical in both Bee and Peachtree corners at 5%.
- Peachtree corners has a higher unemployment rate at 3.1% compared to 2.5% in Bee.
Demographics
Demographics Bee vs Peachtree corners provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bee | Peachtree corners |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 24 |
White | 99 | 43 |
Asian | Data is updating | 8 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 17 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bee vs Peachtree corners
- In Peachtree corners, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 24% compared to 0% in Bee.
- Bee has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 43% in Peachtree corners.
- In Peachtree corners, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Bee.
- Peachtree corners has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 0% in Bee.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Peachtree corners at 7%, compared to 1% in Bee.
- In Peachtree corners, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bee.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bee | Peachtree corners |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 13.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.3% | 8.5% |
Depression | 16.7% | 16.7% |
Smoking | 13.6% | 10.6% |
Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 29.0% |
Disability Percentage | 37.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bee vs Peachtree corners
- In Peachtree corners, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.0% compared to 12.8% in Bee.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 16.7%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bee at 13.6% compared to 10.6% in Peachtree corners.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bee at 22.4% compared to 14.9% in Peachtree corners.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bee at 35.0% compared to 29.0% in Peachtree corners.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bee at 37.0% compared to 4.0% in Peachtree corners.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bee | Peachtree corners |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (2) | 0.4% (150) |
High School Diploma | 26.6% (45) | 10.7% (4,527) |
Less than High School | 8.3% (14) | 8.3% (3,491) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (17) | 34.2% (14,398) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bee vs Peachtree corners
- A higher percentage of residents in Bee have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Peachtree corners.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bee hold a high school diploma at 26.6% compared to 10.7% in Peachtree corners.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 8.3%.
- In Peachtree corners, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.2% compared to 10.1% in Bee.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.