Demographics details for Bedford, VA vs Wyoming, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bedford, VA vs Wyoming, NY.
| Data | Bedford | Wyoming |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,735 | 39,666 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 42.9 years |
| Median Income | $41,154 | $65,066 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Bedford vs Wyoming
- The population in Wyoming is higher at 39,666, compared to 6,735 in Bedford.
- The median age in Wyoming is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 40.5 years in Bedford.
- Wyoming has a higher median income of $65,066, compared to $41,154 in Bedford.
- In Wyoming, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 32.0% in Bedford.
- Bedford has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Wyoming.
- The unemployment rate in Bedford is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Wyoming.
Demographics
Demographics Bedford vs Wyoming provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bedford | Wyoming |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 4 |
| White | 75 | 89 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bedford vs Wyoming
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bedford at 17% compared to 4% in Wyoming.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wyoming at 89% compared to 75% in Bedford.
- The Asian population is larger in Bedford at 3% compared to 1% in Wyoming.
- Wyoming has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Bedford.
- Both Bedford and Wyoming have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bedford and Wyoming at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bedford | Wyoming |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 41.8% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bedford vs Wyoming
- More residents in Bedford report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 15.6% in Wyoming.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bedford at 25.4% compared to 21.4% in Wyoming.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bedford at 21.9% compared to 20.2% in Wyoming.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wyoming at 19.5% compared to 15.7% in Bedford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bedford at 41.8% compared to 39.1% in Wyoming.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wyoming at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Bedford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bedford | Wyoming |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (87) | 0.9% (348) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (1,518) | 22.8% (9,052) |
| Less than High School | 19.7% (1,324) | 16.1% (6,402) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (909) | 13.6% (5,378) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bedford vs Wyoming
- A higher percentage of residents in Bedford have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.9% in Wyoming.
- In Wyoming, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 22.5% in Bedford.
- More residents in Bedford have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 16.1% in Wyoming.
- In Wyoming, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.6% compared to 13.5% in Bedford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.