Demographics details for Bedford, VA vs Washington, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bedford, VA vs Washington, LA.
| Data | Bedford | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,735 | 726 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 26.6 years |
| Median Income | $41,154 | $36,719 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Bedford vs Washington
- In Bedford, the population is higher at 6,735, compared to 726 in Washington.
- Residents in Bedford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 26.6 years in Washington.
- Bedford has a higher median income of $41,154 compared to $36,719 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bedford at 32.0% compared to 23.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 15%, compared to 10% in Bedford.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Bedford.
Demographics
Demographics Bedford vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bedford | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 65 |
| White | 75 | 20 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bedford vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 17% in Bedford.
- Bedford has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 20% in Washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Bedford at 3% compared to 0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Bedford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 12%, compared to 3% in Bedford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bedford and Washington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bedford | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 41.8% | 41.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bedford vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 19.9% in Bedford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 25.5% versus 25.4% in Bedford.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 21.9% in Bedford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bedford at 15.7% compared to 15.1% in Washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bedford at 41.8% compared to 41.5% in Washington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bedford at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bedford | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (87) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (1,518) | 20.2% (147) |
| Less than High School | 19.7% (1,324) | 27.7% (201) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (909) | 7.3% (53) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bedford vs Washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Bedford have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bedford hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 20.2% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 27.7%, compared to 19.7% in Bedford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bedford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 7.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.