Demographics details for Bedford, VA vs Snoqualmie, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bedford, VA vs Snoqualmie, WA.
| Data | Bedford | Snoqualmie |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,735 | 13,621 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $41,154 | $186,353 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bedford vs Snoqualmie
- The population in Snoqualmie is higher at 13,621, compared to 6,735 in Bedford.
- Residents in Bedford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 38.6 years in Snoqualmie.
- Snoqualmie has a higher median income of $186,353, compared to $41,154 in Bedford.
- In Snoqualmie, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 32.0% in Bedford.
- Bedford has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 3% in Snoqualmie.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Bedford and Snoqualmie at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Bedford vs Snoqualmie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bedford | Snoqualmie |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 1 |
| White | 75 | 77 |
| Asian | 3 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bedford vs Snoqualmie
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bedford at 17% compared to 1% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Snoqualmie at 77% compared to 75% in Bedford.
- In Snoqualmie, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 3% in Bedford.
- Snoqualmie has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Bedford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Snoqualmie at 7%, compared to 3% in Bedford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bedford and Snoqualmie at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bedford | Snoqualmie |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 7.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 41.8% | 21.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bedford vs Snoqualmie
- More residents in Bedford report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 14.1% in Snoqualmie.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bedford at 25.4% compared to 23.9% in Snoqualmie.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bedford at 21.9% compared to 7.3% in Snoqualmie.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Snoqualmie at 19.3% compared to 15.7% in Bedford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bedford at 41.8% compared to 21.9% in Snoqualmie.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bedford at 11.0% compared to 4.0% in Snoqualmie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bedford | Snoqualmie |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (87) | 0.2% (34) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (1,518) | 5.8% (792) |
| Less than High School | 19.7% (1,324) | 1.5% (209) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (909) | 45.3% (6,177) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bedford vs Snoqualmie
- A higher percentage of residents in Bedford have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Snoqualmie.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bedford hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 5.8% in Snoqualmie.
- More residents in Bedford have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 1.5% in Snoqualmie.
- In Snoqualmie, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.3% compared to 13.5% in Bedford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.