Demographics details for Bedford, VA vs Kingman, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bedford, VA vs Kingman, AZ.
| Data | Bedford | Kingman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,735 | 34,918 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 42.1 years |
| Median Income | $41,154 | $56,360 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Bedford vs Kingman
- The population in Kingman is higher at 34,918, compared to 6,735 in Bedford.
- The median age in Kingman is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 40.5 years in Bedford.
- Kingman has a higher median income of $56,360, compared to $41,154 in Bedford.
- In Kingman, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Bedford.
- The poverty level is higher in Kingman at 12%, compared to 10% in Bedford.
- Kingman has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Bedford.
Demographics
Demographics Bedford vs Kingman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bedford | Kingman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 2 |
| White | 75 | 72 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bedford vs Kingman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bedford at 17% compared to 2% in Kingman.
- Bedford has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 72% in Kingman.
- The Asian population is larger in Bedford at 3% compared to 2% in Kingman.
- Kingman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 2% in Bedford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kingman at 7%, compared to 3% in Bedford.
- In Kingman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bedford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bedford | Kingman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 19.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 41.8% | 34.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bedford vs Kingman
- More residents in Bedford report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.2% in Kingman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bedford at 25.4% compared to 21.2% in Kingman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bedford at 21.9% compared to 19.1% in Kingman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kingman at 18.5% compared to 15.7% in Bedford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bedford at 41.8% compared to 34.5% in Kingman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kingman at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Bedford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bedford | Kingman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (87) | 0.8% (266) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (1,518) | 15.7% (5,487) |
| Less than High School | 19.7% (1,324) | 13.6% (4,744) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (909) | 13.7% (4,777) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bedford vs Kingman
- A higher percentage of residents in Bedford have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.8% in Kingman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bedford hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 15.7% in Kingman.
- More residents in Bedford have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 13.6% in Kingman.
- In Kingman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 13.5% in Bedford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.