Demographics details for Bedford, VA vs Clinton, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bedford, VA vs Clinton, SC.
| Data | Bedford | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,735 | 7,554 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $41,154 | $38,350 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Bedford vs Clinton
- The population in Clinton is higher at 7,554, compared to 6,735 in Bedford.
- Residents in Bedford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Bedford has a higher median income of $41,154 compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bedford at 32.0% compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Clinton at 18%, compared to 10% in Bedford.
- Clinton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Bedford.
Demographics
Demographics Bedford vs Clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bedford | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 38 |
| White | 75 | 55 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bedford vs Clinton
- In Clinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 17% in Bedford.
- Bedford has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 55% in Clinton.
- The Asian population is larger in Bedford at 3% compared to 2% in Clinton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bedford at 2% compared to 1% in Clinton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clinton at 4%, compared to 3% in Bedford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bedford and Clinton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bedford | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 41.8% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bedford vs Clinton
- More residents in Bedford report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 19.1% in Clinton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bedford at 25.4% compared to 23.7% in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 21.9% in Bedford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clinton at 15.8% compared to 15.7% in Bedford.
- Clinton has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 41.8% in Bedford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Bedford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bedford | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (87) | 1.0% (74) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (1,518) | 19.3% (1,460) |
| Less than High School | 19.7% (1,324) | 15.6% (1,177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (909) | 17.3% (1,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bedford vs Clinton
- A higher percentage of residents in Bedford have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.0% in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bedford hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 19.3% in Clinton.
- More residents in Bedford have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 15.6% in Clinton.
- In Clinton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 13.5% in Bedford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.