Demographics details for Beaverton, OR vs Wapakoneta, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Beaverton, OR vs Wapakoneta, OH.

Data Beaverton Wapakoneta
Population 97,053 9,776
Median Age 36.7 years 41.6 years
Median Income $88,899 $63,008
Married Families 38.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 7% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 4.5

Population Comparison: Beaverton vs Wapakoneta

  • In Beaverton, the population is higher at 97,053, compared to 9,776 in Wapakoneta.
  • The median age in Wapakoneta is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 36.7 years in Beaverton.
  • Beaverton has a higher median income of $88,899 compared to $63,008 in Wapakoneta.
  • In Wapakoneta, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 38.0% in Beaverton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Wapakoneta at 10%, compared to 7% in Beaverton.
  • Wapakoneta has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.6% in Beaverton.

Demographics

Demographics Beaverton vs Wapakoneta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Beaverton Wapakoneta
Black 3 1
White 57 89
Asian 12 Data is updating
Hispanic 18 5
Two or More Races 10 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Beaverton vs Wapakoneta

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Beaverton at 3% compared to 1% in Wapakoneta.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Wapakoneta at 89% compared to 57% in Beaverton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Beaverton at 12% compared to 0% in Wapakoneta.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Beaverton at 18% compared to 5% in Wapakoneta.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Beaverton at 10% compared to 5% in Wapakoneta.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaverton and Wapakoneta at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Beaverton Wapakoneta
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 18.1%
Physical Health Not Good 9.3% 12.3%
Depression 22.9% 23.8%
Smoking 10.9% 21.3%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 18.8%
Obesity 31.3% 38.8%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Beaverton vs Wapakoneta

  • In Wapakoneta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.6% in Beaverton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Wapakoneta at 23.8% versus 22.9% in Beaverton.
  • Wapakoneta has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 10.9% in Beaverton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Wapakoneta at 18.8% compared to 16.6% in Beaverton.
  • Wapakoneta has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 31.3% in Beaverton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wapakoneta at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaverton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Beaverton Wapakoneta
No Schooling 0.6% (619) 0.1% (9)
High School Diploma 9.8% (9,471) 26.9% (2,625)
Less than High School 7.2% (7,010) 11.8% (1,157)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.9% (33,872) 14.0% (1,364)

Education Levels Comparison: Beaverton vs Wapakoneta

  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaverton have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Wapakoneta.
  • In Wapakoneta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 9.8% in Beaverton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wapakoneta at 11.8%, compared to 7.2% in Beaverton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaverton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 14.0% in Wapakoneta.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.