Demographics details for Beaverton, OR vs Springfield, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Beaverton, OR vs Springfield, MA.

Data Beaverton Springfield
Population 97,053 154,064
Median Age 36.7 years 33.4 years
Median Income $88,899 $47,677
Married Families 38.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 7% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 6.9

Population Comparison: Beaverton vs Springfield

  • The population in Springfield is higher at 154,064, compared to 97,053 in Beaverton.
  • Residents in Beaverton have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 33.4 years in Springfield.
  • Beaverton has a higher median income of $88,899 compared to $47,677 in Springfield.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Beaverton at 38.0% compared to 26.0% in Springfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Springfield at 20%, compared to 7% in Beaverton.
  • Springfield has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 3.6% in Beaverton.

Demographics

Demographics Beaverton vs Springfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Beaverton Springfield
Black 3 21
White 57 8
Asian 12 3
Hispanic 18 49
Two or More Races 10 19
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Beaverton vs Springfield

  • In Springfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 3% in Beaverton.
  • Beaverton has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 8% in Springfield.
  • The Asian population is larger in Beaverton at 12% compared to 3% in Springfield.
  • Springfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 18% in Beaverton.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springfield at 19%, compared to 10% in Beaverton.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaverton and Springfield at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Beaverton Springfield
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 21.2%
Physical Health Not Good 9.3% 14.9%
Depression 22.9% 25.8%
Smoking 10.9% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 14.3%
Obesity 31.3% 40.8%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Beaverton vs Springfield

  • In Springfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 15.6% in Beaverton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Springfield at 25.8% versus 22.9% in Beaverton.
  • Springfield has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 10.9% in Beaverton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Beaverton at 16.6% compared to 14.3% in Springfield.
  • Springfield has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 31.3% in Beaverton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springfield at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaverton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Beaverton Springfield
No Schooling 0.6% (619) 2.0% (3,005)
High School Diploma 9.8% (9,471) 16.7% (25,679)
Less than High School 7.2% (7,010) 23.8% (36,663)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.9% (33,872) 12.7% (19,500)

Education Levels Comparison: Beaverton vs Springfield

  • In Springfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.6% in Beaverton.
  • In Springfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 9.8% in Beaverton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Springfield at 23.8%, compared to 7.2% in Beaverton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaverton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 12.7% in Springfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.