Demographics details for Beaverton, OR vs Charlottesville, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Beaverton, OR vs Charlottesville, VA.

Data Beaverton Charlottesville
Population 97,053 45,373
Median Age 36.7 years 32.4 years
Median Income $88,899 $67,177
Married Families 38.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 7% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 2.7

Population Comparison: Beaverton vs Charlottesville

  • In Beaverton, the population is higher at 97,053, compared to 45,373 in Charlottesville.
  • Residents in Beaverton have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 32.4 years in Charlottesville.
  • Beaverton has a higher median income of $88,899 compared to $67,177 in Charlottesville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Beaverton at 38.0% compared to 30.0% in Charlottesville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Charlottesville at 12%, compared to 7% in Beaverton.
  • The unemployment rate in Beaverton is higher at 3.6%, compared to 2.7% in Charlottesville.

Demographics

Demographics Beaverton vs Charlottesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Beaverton Charlottesville
Black 3 18
White 57 63
Asian 12 7
Hispanic 18 6
Two or More Races 10 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Beaverton vs Charlottesville

  • In Charlottesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 3% in Beaverton.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Charlottesville at 63% compared to 57% in Beaverton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Beaverton at 12% compared to 7% in Charlottesville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Beaverton at 18% compared to 6% in Charlottesville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Beaverton at 10% compared to 6% in Charlottesville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaverton and Charlottesville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Beaverton Charlottesville
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 16.4%
Physical Health Not Good 9.3% 10.5%
Depression 22.9% 22.4%
Smoking 10.9% 15.0%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 16.7%
Obesity 31.3% 32.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Beaverton vs Charlottesville

  • In Charlottesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.6% in Beaverton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Beaverton at 22.9% compared to 22.4% in Charlottesville.
  • Charlottesville has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 10.9% in Beaverton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Charlottesville at 16.7% compared to 16.6% in Beaverton.
  • Charlottesville has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 31.3% in Beaverton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Beaverton at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Charlottesville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Beaverton Charlottesville
No Schooling 0.6% (619) 1.1% (495)
High School Diploma 9.8% (9,471) 7.8% (3,550)
Less than High School 7.2% (7,010) 7.6% (3,427)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.9% (33,872) 38.2% (17,339)

Education Levels Comparison: Beaverton vs Charlottesville

  • In Charlottesville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Beaverton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaverton hold a high school diploma at 9.8% compared to 7.8% in Charlottesville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Charlottesville at 7.6%, compared to 7.2% in Beaverton.
  • In Charlottesville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.2% compared to 34.9% in Beaverton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.