Demographics details for Beaverton, MI vs Fort thomas, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaverton, MI vs Fort thomas, KY.
| Data | Beaverton | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,156 | 17,133 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $31,985 | $95,391 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Beaverton vs Fort thomas
- The population in Fort thomas is higher at 17,133, compared to 1,156 in Beaverton.
- Residents in Beaverton have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 37.9 years in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391, compared to $31,985 in Beaverton.
- In Fort thomas, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 30.0% in Beaverton.
- Beaverton has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
- The unemployment rate in Beaverton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.
Demographics
Demographics Beaverton vs Fort thomas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beaverton | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 93 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Beaverton vs Fort thomas
- In Fort thomas, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Beaverton.
- Beaverton has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 92% in Fort thomas.
- In Fort thomas, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Beaverton.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Beaverton and Fort thomas at 1%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Beaverton at 5% compared to 4% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaverton and Fort thomas at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beaverton | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 28.3% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaverton vs Fort thomas
- More residents in Beaverton report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Beaverton at 28.3% compared to 26.2% in Fort thomas.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Beaverton at 24.8% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beaverton at 18.0% compared to 17.1% in Fort thomas.
- Obesity rates are higher in Beaverton at 39.3% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Beaverton at 27.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beaverton | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (11) | 0.4% (66) |
| High School Diploma | 25.3% (293) | 10.7% (1,840) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (162) | 3.3% (569) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (93) | 37.3% (6,383) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaverton vs Fort thomas
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaverton have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Fort thomas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaverton hold a high school diploma at 25.3% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- More residents in Beaverton have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
- In Fort thomas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 8.0% in Beaverton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.